Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Machine\s+shop\s+questions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Machine\s+shop\s+questions\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [Tigers] Machine shop questions (score: 1): Author: "Tiger Man" <Tigerman67@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:25:16 -0700; Hey there, I thought I would ask the group some questions and see if you guys can bring up my machine shop IQ. I found a deal on a used 289 5 bolt bell housing reasonably local to my area for not muc; /html/tigers/2008-12/msg00146.html (7,840 bytes)
2. Re: [Tigers] Machine shop questions (score: 1): Author: "A. C. Tynes" <v8tracker@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:20:23 -0600; I can't help with all the questions, but I can tell you for sure that the cylinder walls in a 302 block are a little longer than in a 289. During the 289-302 changeover, a number of 289 engines were; /html/tigers/2008-12/msg00147.html (10,474 bytes)
3. Re: [Tigers] Machine shop questions (score: 1): Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:39:37 -0500; You really need a bore gage to read the diameter. You also want to make sure the bores are not trumpet shaped. You can do this with a snap gage but you also need a 4" micrometer to get a really good; /html/tigers/2008-12/msg00148.html (10,227 bytes)
4. Re: [Tigers] Machine shop questions (score: 1): Author: "steve wick" <srwick@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:38:39 -0800; I'm curious what the actual measurements are for the cylinder wall length between the 289 and 302. I know the stroke is longer on a 302, but that wouldn't necessarily translate into a longer cylinder; /html/tigers/2008-12/msg00150.html (12,277 bytes)
5. [Tigers] Machine shop questions (score: 1): Author: Dave Munroe <dave@munroe.ca>; Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:54:24 -0400; (I apologize if you received this message twice: the first time I sent it from my Blackberry, and it appeared not to be delivered.) Steve: I am not comfortable contradicting my learned list friends,; /html/tigers/2008-12/msg00153.html (9,914 bytes)
6. [Tigers] Machine shop questions (score: 1): Author: spmdr@juno.com; Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 08:47:38 -0800; My $.02 Several years ago I looked over as many 289 and 302 blocks as I could lay my hands on. The conclusion was, NO significant difference in functional bore length. And looking at stroker kits, pi; /html/tigers/2008-12/msg00154.html (8,287 bytes)
7. Re: [Tigers] Machine shop questions (score: 1): Author: bob@hermitagewood.com; Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:48:30 -0700; Hi Dave, I too have a 66 Mk1A Tiger and 20+ years ago I embarked on an engine rebuild. The thick-wall-tiger-engine-block story (as told in Performance Tuning the Sunbeam Tiger) persuaded me to have t; /html/tigers/2008-12/msg00155.html (9,050 bytes)
8. Re: [Tigers] Machine shop questions (score: 1): Author: Dave Munroe <dave@munroe.ca>; Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:14:13 -0400; Thanks Bob for that intelligence. Wow - a .200" overbore....wild! I truly am not worried considering the performance of my engine to date. But I might not be so frisky if I had .200" bores in there..; /html/tigers/2008-12/msg00156.html (9,923 bytes)
9. Re: [Tigers] Machine shop questions (score: 1): Author: "Bob Hokanson" <tgrrr@peoplepc.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:42:30 -0800; On page 20 of George Reid's book, "High Performance Ford Engine Parts Interchange", he states the following: "Though 302 blocks looked virtually identical to the 289 block, the cylinder bores had ext; /html/tigers/2008-12/msg00157.html (8,257 bytes)
10. Re: [Tigers] Machine shop questions (score: 1): Author: Drmoonstone@aol.com; Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 21:16:38 EST; My stroker 260 project is nearly completely developed. With boring, stroking and the right heads we are approaching 390 hp. The question of reliability is still in question. After two builds, we will; /html/tigers/2008-12/msg00182.html (8,368 bytes)
11. Re: [Tigers] Machine shop questions (score: 1): Author: "michael king" <michael.s.king@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 14:02:12 +1100; Werent the alloy clock motors they tested for the indy and the early GT40s a quad cam? similar to a DFV? Anyway... unless there was a specific reason to run such a rare block 9cant imagine any tiger; /html/tigers/2008-12/msg00190.html (8,151 bytes)
12. Re: [Tigers] Machine shop questions (score: 1): Author: Drmoonstone@aol.com; Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 18:21:23 EST; Don't really want one except for bragging rights. These engines were tested in multiple head configuration. They are just something for the eye to behold Sean ** One site keeps you connected to all y; /html/tigers/2008-12/msg00191.html (8,153 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]