Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Water\s+pump\s+flange\s+height\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Water\s+pump\s+flange\s+height\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Tigers] Water pump flange height (score: 1): Author: "Ronak, TP $Timothy$" <Timothy.Ronak@crna.akzonobel.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 23:26:17 -0400; Can anyone confirm the stock pulley flange distance for a 260 Tiger. Based on my research it should be 4.875 inches from the back of the pump bolt on flange to the outer face of the pulley flange. I; /html/tigers/2008-03/msg00181.html (7,564 bytes)
2. Re: [Tigers] Water pump flange height (score: 1): Author: Sandy Ganz <sganz@pacbell.net>; Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:39:56 -0700 (PDT); I just did that to an Edelbrock victor pump but don't have the dimensions handy. The type of balancer does make a difference, if stock, I'm not sure what it is, but I do have a a flat face aftermark; /html/tigers/2008-03/msg00182.html (8,691 bytes)
3. Re: [Tigers] Water pump flange height (score: 1): Author: "Bob Hokanson" <tgrrr@peoplepc.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:17:45 -0700; Just measured what I believe to be an original pump and it is 4 7/8 from back of pump to outer face of pulley flange. Bob H _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www; /html/tigers/2008-03/msg00185.html (8,363 bytes)
4. Re: [Tigers] Water pump flange height (score: 1): Author: "Ronak, TP $Timothy$" <Timothy.Ronak@crna.akzonobel.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:29:21 -0400; Bob THANKS!! That 4 7/8 " measurement jives exactly with the 4.875" measurement I have received before. Tom Hall sent me a diagram that shows 4.915" and in close examination of my car the water pump; /html/tigers/2008-03/msg00186.html (9,569 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]