Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[evolution\-disc\.\]\s+Re\:\s+Boxster\s+S\s+reclassification\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[evolution\-disc\.\]\s+Re\:\s+Boxster\s+S\s+reclassification\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. RE: [evolution-disc.] Re: Boxster S reclassification (score: 1): Author: Andy Hollis <awhollis@swbell.net>; Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 06:37:24 -0500; Not true at all. Having been an SAC member twice now in different decades, I can say without a doubt that there are governing principles that are used to help deal with it all. Concepts like Best of; /html/autox/2002-04/msg00412.html (11,289 bytes)
2. Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: Boxster S reclassification (score: 1): Author: "James Harn" <jamesh220@attbi.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 17:19:43 -0500; decades, used Yes and that's my point. There's no written guidelines or rules concerning classing which we are bound by. The so called unwritten rulesand concepts are used as rationale conveniently a; /html/autox/2002-04/msg00429.html (13,819 bytes)
3. RE: [evolution-disc.] Re: Boxster S reclassification (score: 1): Author: Andy Hollis <awhollis@swbell.net>; Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 19:33:59 -0500; Wow, what a skeptical attitude! Are you related to Oliver Stone? ;-) "Conveniently"? "excuse"? Just because you may not agree with what is being done by these groups does not mean that what they are; /html/autox/2002-04/msg00437.html (15,792 bytes)
4. RE: [evolution-disc.] Re: Boxster S reclassification (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 21:08:06 -0400 (EDT); And this, IMHO, is why we'll never be able to write general classing rules. Back when I used to race motorcycles, they had (relatively) simple classing rules. xxx cc, production chassis, etc. One cl; /html/autox/2002-04/msg00440.html (8,377 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]