Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[evolution\-disc\.\]\s+T\-Rex\'s\s+legal\s+for\s+Solo2\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [evolution-disc.] T-Rex's legal for Solo2? (score: 1)
Author: James Rogerson <jrogerson@Houston.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 08:57:10 -0500
England was once the great provider of kit "cars" and "cycles". The T-Rex fits the "Cycle" bill. The reasoning then, and probably now, is that a cycle doesn't have the same road licensing requirement
/html/autox/2003-04/msg00167.html (9,629 bytes)

2. RE: [evolution-disc.] T-Rex's legal for Solo2? (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Hollis" <awhollis@swbell.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 12:02:02 -0500
Rule 12.1 (p 77) Definition of car, requires four wheels. The safety rules and car classification rules reference the word "car". --Andy /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.tea
/html/autox/2003-04/msg00174.html (9,097 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu