Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+1998\s+Chevy\s+Recall\s+\-\s+Off\s+Topic\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+1998\s+Chevy\s+Recall\s+\-\s+Off\s+Topic\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [oletrucks] 1998 Chevy Recall - Off Topic (score: 1): Author: Michael E. Mendonç; Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 11:21:20 -0700; I had to turn to all of you experts for this one. I am the original owner of a 1998 Chevy Stepside 1500 with just over 100,000 miles on it. Since about 6 months into owning it, I've had it in the sho; /html/oletrucks/2003-05/msg00479.html (8,417 bytes)
2. Re: [oletrucks] 1998 Chevy Recall - Off Topic (score: 1): Author: Bruce Kettunen <bekett@uslink.net>; Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 23:06:44 -0500; Hate to say this on this board, but the new Chevy trucks aren't anywhere near as durable as the old ones. In 1996, chevy came out with the Vortec engines which had significantly more horsepower than; /html/oletrucks/2003-05/msg00502.html (10,458 bytes)
3. Re: [oletrucks] 1998 Chevy Recall - Off Topic (score: 1): Author: "Ryan Langford" <rlangford@attbi.com>; Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 23:40:55 -0700; Well, I'll second Bruce, the newer Chevies are powerful, but they have problems. As for the tranny, now a days, automatics that last over 100K is kinda rare. Blame it on our disposible society, but m; /html/oletrucks/2003-05/msg00504.html (9,231 bytes)
4. Re: [oletrucks] 1998 Chevy Recall - Off Topic (score: 1): Author: dcvjrv@covad.net; Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 05:23:01 -0400; I have found the best way to avoid most of these problems is to just recycle the complete vehicle every 2 years. I haven't had any problems to speak of in doing this for the last 20 years. :>) Jim V.; /html/oletrucks/2003-05/msg00507.html (10,104 bytes)
5. Re: [oletrucks] 1998 Chevy Recall - Off Topic (score: 1): Author: Rich Kosiba <kosibar@kolbenet.com>; Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 09:25:47 -0400 (EDT); I keep saying it and people think it's a joke, but seriously - it isn't old enough. My brother is getting transmission codes in his Camaro (the newer Camaro). I've had starters die one after another; /html/oletrucks/2003-05/msg00515.html (8,513 bytes)
6. RE: [oletrucks] 1998 Chevy Recall - Off Topic (score: 1): Author: "Hanlon, Bill (ISS Houston)" <bill.hanlon@hp.com>; Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 09:34:31 -0500; Maybe Michael should update his '98 with a solid front axle, a 216, huck brakes, a granny-low 4 speed and a 4.56 rear end. I keep saying it and people think it's a joke, but seriously - it isn't old; /html/oletrucks/2003-05/msg00522.html (8,941 bytes)
7. RE: [oletrucks] 1998 Chevy Recall - Off Topic (score: 1): Author: Bruce Kettunen <bekett@uslink.net>; Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 11:22:17 -0500; I think I'd keep the IFS and front disk brakes, they last pretty well, but for sure on the rest. I tend to lean towards the TF driveline, pressure oiled 235, granny low 4 speed, open drive line. I'd; /html/oletrucks/2003-05/msg00533.html (9,888 bytes)
8. RE: [oletrucks] 1998 Chevy Recall - Off Topic (score: 1): Author: Rich Kosiba <kosibar@kolbenet.com>; Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 15:13:53 -0400 (EDT); I disagree. He should definitely put a 235 in there and get the 3.55 ring and pinion for it. Then he'll be all set! oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959; /html/oletrucks/2003-05/msg00545.html (9,540 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]