Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+Corvett\s+vs\s+mustang\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+Corvett\s+vs\s+mustang\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [oletrucks] Corvett vs mustang (score: 1): Author: Old52pu@cs.com; Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 22:49:54 EDT; What about the Jagger suspension fellows? I saw the rear suspension on a 53 pickup, Looked pretty good and the owner said it handled great. Larry oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built bet; /html/oletrucks/2003-04/msg00137.html (7,083 bytes)
2. [oletrucks] corvett vs mustang (score: 1): Author: Old52pu@cs.com; Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 22:52:59 EDT; Let me try to spell that again. Thats a Jaguer rear suspension. Later, Larry oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959; /html/oletrucks/2003-04/msg00139.html (6,973 bytes)
3. RE: [oletrucks] corvett vs mustang (score: 1): Author: "Dane Bruce" <nochay@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 20:44:36 -0700; Hey Larry, You mean Jaguar. (ford/edsel boy here) Jaguar is also a ford product. I'm not really sure how good they are. Would be interesting though. Dane Let me try to spell that again. Thats a Jague; /html/oletrucks/2003-04/msg00141.html (7,618 bytes)
4. Re:[oletrucks] Corvett vs mustang (score: 1): Author: Ed ke6bnl <ke6bnl@juno.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 06:51:40 GMT; I did see a 53 with a jag front end and I thought it was ugly maybe with the fenders on it would hide some of the garbage under their. I have installed a mustangII looks good may not actually work as; /html/oletrucks/2003-04/msg00145.html (7,694 bytes)
5. Re:[oletrucks] Corvett vs mustang (score: 1): Author: "chuck clark" <cachomeimp@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2003 08:49:44 -0400; I was looking at a sight the other night, industrialchassisinc.com, that had an IFS that used dodge truck components. They did not use it for chevy trucks, only Ford, because, apparently, the chevy f; /html/oletrucks/2003-04/msg00147.html (8,893 bytes)
6. Re:[oletrucks] Corvett vs mustang (score: 1): Author: "jon peters" <i51gmc@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2003 18:23:45 -0400; WHAT GARBAGE? It all depends how you mount the jag suspension. I am installing it under my 51 gmc. and it installs a lot cleaner (to the frame) than a Mustang2 ever would. My install is a bolt on dea; /html/oletrucks/2003-04/msg00170.html (9,308 bytes)
7. Re:[oletrucks] Corvett vs mustang (score: 1): Author: "Old GMC Pickup" <truxrme@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2003 19:30:05 -0500; They make M2 bolt on kits now also, plus the parts are carried by more aftermarket shops, Corvette & Jag suspension are expensive and hard to come by parts...my 2 scents WHAT GARBAGE? It all depends; /html/oletrucks/2003-04/msg00176.html (9,969 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]