Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+DON\'T\s+BUY\s+HOOKER\s+HEADERS\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+DON\'T\s+BUY\s+HOOKER\s+HEADERS\!\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [oletrucks] DON'T BUY HOOKER HEADERS! (score: 1): Author: "Jack Halton" <safesix@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 22:54:31 -0500; So Greg...how do REALLY feel about Hooker Headers? -- Original Message -- From: "Greg St Pierre" <gstpierr@u.washington.edu> To: "John Maertens" <mcdac@rconnect.com> Cc: <oletrucks@autox.team.net> Se; /html/oletrucks/2000-03/msg00000.html (8,481 bytes)
2. Re: [oletrucks] DON'T BUY HOOKER HEADERS! (score: 1): Author: Greg St Pierre <gstpierr@u.washington.edu>; Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 12:46:03 -0800 (PST); I know that my previous dissertation may have seemed harsh to some, but I believe it was rightly so. To elaborate on the actual circumstances is a bit lengthy, so fair warning to those who weary at; /html/oletrucks/2000-03/msg00010.html (12,006 bytes)
3. Re: [oletrucks] DON'T BUY HOOKER HEADERS! (score: 1): Author: John Maertens <mcdac@rconnect.com>; Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 15:29:53 -0600; Thanks for the information Greg. You may have saved some of us a bunch of aggravation. I think I'll look at Hedman or Sanderson John '70 GMC minnesota oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks buil; /html/oletrucks/2000-03/msg00011.html (7,902 bytes)
4. Re: [oletrucks] DON'T BUY HOOKER HEADERS! (score: 1): Author: "rreul" <rreul@gallatinriver.net>; Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 15:59:57 -0600; Youre a better man than me-- I would have never ordered the second set. Rich Reul 1951 3604 can the oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959; /html/oletrucks/2000-03/msg00012.html (13,337 bytes)
5. Re: [oletrucks] DON'T BUY HOOKER HEADERS! (score: 1): Author: Bob_Keeland@usgs.gov (Bob Keeland); Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 16:13:31 -0700; I'm sure thinking more along the line of Sanderson now . . . BobK 51 3600 5-window, Louisiana oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959; /html/oletrucks/2000-03/msg00013.html (7,507 bytes)
6. Re: [oletrucks] DON'T BUY HOOKER HEADERS! (score: 1): Author: Greg St Pierre <gstpierr@u.washington.edu>; Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 15:57:23 -0800 (PST); Does TFB stand for what I think it does? Anyway my reply was to someone asking about which headers to buy... HANFD oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959; /html/oletrucks/2000-03/msg00014.html (7,675 bytes)
7. Re: [oletrucks] DON'T BUY HOOKER HEADERS! (score: 1): Author: ADvent@thuntek.net; Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 17:24:21 -0700; When I had my auto repair buisness, headers would be the thing most people hate or love. Those who hate them are the ones who gave up tightning bolts or sealing up leaks. It is amazing that many head; /html/oletrucks/2000-03/msg00016.html (7,829 bytes)
8. Re: [oletrucks] DON'T BUY HOOKER HEADERS! (score: 1): Author: "WR Teto" <monadnoc@crystal-mtn.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 23:00:44 -0500; Disregard it Greg. And thanks for the info on the Hooker header problems you had. I did not know that they were so poorly made. You know, I have seen a lot of guys at car shows complaining about Hook; /html/oletrucks/2000-03/msg00023.html (8,080 bytes)
9. Re: [oletrucks] DON'T BUY HOOKER HEADERS! (score: 1): Author: "Lonnie L. Dickey" <mdickey@silverback.gorilla.net>; Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 19:48:02 -0600; Very interesting. I have long and good history with Hookers. However, based on your example, I wonder if the problem stems from the takeover by Holley? I have recently had similar problems with a new; /html/oletrucks/2000-03/msg00031.html (14,269 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]