Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+Different\s+Ratio\s+Rear\s+End\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+Different\s+Ratio\s+Rear\s+End\?\?\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [oletrucks] Different Ratio Rear End?? (score: 1): Author: thistle@midcoast.com (Kathy Bray); Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 12:11:47 -0400; Since my 1952 half ton pickup has a later (1954) and more powerful engine than it came with (a 235 instead of a 216), I'm wondering if I shouldn't change to a different ratio rear end so that the en; /html/oletrucks/1999-04/msg00901.html (7,760 bytes)
2. Re: [oletrucks] Different Ratio Rear End?? (score: 1): Author: "Rob Jacobs" <rjj0msj@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 13:23:52 -0700; It isn't the engine, it is the rearend and what the truck was expected to do, and that was to haul heavy loads at low speed. You will not find gears to replace your stock gears except those from Patr; /html/oletrucks/1999-04/msg00908.html (8,876 bytes)
3. Re: [oletrucks] Different Ratio Rear End?? (score: 1): Author: Grant Galbraith <trks@javanet.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 21:54:22 -0400; The engine does have some bearing here. A 216 with 3.55 gears may be a little disappointing if you want to haul firewood up side of a hill. I could hardly notice a difference between the 3.90 and 4.1; /html/oletrucks/1999-04/msg00918.html (9,706 bytes)
4. Re: [oletrucks] Different Ratio Rear End?? (score: 1): Author: "Rob Jacobs" <rjj0msj@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 07:40:34 -0700; Right you are about the engine and hauling loads, but I was speaking only to her concern about the revs. However, you are also right about the 3.90 versus 4.11 gears. Didn't help mine much and neithe; /html/oletrucks/1999-04/msg00926.html (10,899 bytes)
5. RE: [oletrucks] Different Ratio Rear End?? (score: 1): Author: Tom Burt <tburt@hirose.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 08:40:22 -0700; Grant/Oletrucks Configuration Gurus, That may be what I need for my '57. What does it take for OD? Is it a tailshaft adapter or is it a whole tranny? I like having the orig rear and would prefer a wi; /html/oletrucks/1999-04/msg00929.html (10,303 bytes)
6. Re: [oletrucks] Different Ratio Rear End?? (score: 1): Author: Grant Galbraith <trks@javanet.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 14:20:26 -0400; Tom, your task force would be very easy because it had an OD option. You would need the whole trans as they use a different mainshaft for the OD. The OD option used a 4.10 rear but 3.90 works fine. Y; /html/oletrucks/1999-04/msg00933.html (11,373 bytes)
7. RE: [oletrucks] Different Ratio Rear End?? (score: 1): Author: Tom Burt <tburt@hirose.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 11:32:52 -0700; Thanks Grant. OK - Any of you folks out there come across a stock TF tranny with the OD option? Please let me know. Tom B. '57 Stepside 3200 Tom, your task force would be very easy because it had an; /html/oletrucks/1999-04/msg00934.html (11,765 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]