Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+Engine\s+Weights\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+Engine\s+Weights\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. [oletrucks] Engine Weights (score: 1): Author: "Thomas, Robert" <RThomas@ButteCounty.net>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 10:04:53 -0700; In response to "What does a big block ( 454) Chevy engine weigh? That is, with accessories? Thanks. Bob K" Try this link: http://www.classictruckshop.com/engine_sizes.asp You will find the following; /html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00657.html (8,822 bytes)
2. Re: [oletrucks] Engine Weights (score: 1): Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 10:55:59 -0700; Thanks. The reason I was asking is I was wondering if it would be feasible to put a GMC 401 V-6 in a 1951- GMC pick up. I think the V-6's weighed 800-900 lbs. Bob K oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and; /html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00659.html (9,840 bytes)
3. Re: [oletrucks] Engine Weights (score: 1): Author: "Steve Hanberg" <steve@OldSub.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 11:07:19 -0700; I don't know much about those V-6's, but the reason I bought the 454 might be a valid reason for you to reconsider. I have a Buick 430, which was the predecessor of the 455. It cost me nothing and I; /html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00660.html (10,902 bytes)
4. Re: [oletrucks] Engine Weights (score: 1): Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 12:20:55 -0700; I'll probably stick with a 292 six. I'd rather go with a strictly GMC engine, but it seems the 302's are going out of sight. Bob K oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1; /html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00662.html (10,940 bytes)
5. Re: [oletrucks] Engine Weights (score: 1): Author: Devin Ranger <devin_ranger@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 12:39:08 -0700 (PDT); The 6066 GMC list is an outstanding resource for GMC V6 enthusiasts: http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/6066_GMC_Truck/ I had considered something similar (TF truck). I have a 305 V6 on an engine d; /html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00664.html (12,723 bytes)
6. RE: [oletrucks] Engine Weights (score: 1): Author: "Hanlon, Bill (ISS Houston)" <bill.hanlon@hp.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 15:08:29 -0500; Different? That would be the V-12 version. Two of these puppies end to end. Bob, The 6066 GMC list is an outstanding resource for GMC V6 enthusiasts: http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/6066_GMC_Truc; /html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00665.html (13,195 bytes)
7. Re: [oletrucks] Engine Weights (score: 1): Author: "Steve Hanberg" <steve@OldSub.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 13:15:33 -0700; Have you thought about buying a 270 and boring it out to 302? I'm sure I read somewhere that someone had done that, and I don't think 270's are that hard to come by. I know where one is near Portland; /html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00667.html (12,024 bytes)
8. Re: [oletrucks] Engine Weights (score: 1): Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 14:09:21 -0700; Need more than a 3/4 ton pick up to carry it!! Bob -- Original Message -- From: "Hanlon, Bill (ISS Houston)" <bill.hanlon@hp.com> To: "Devin Ranger" <devin_ranger@yahoo.com>; "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@q; /html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00668.html (13,646 bytes)
9. Re: [oletrucks] Engine Weights (score: 1): Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 14:10:30 -0700; That's a thought. But I understand the 302 head "breathes" a lot better. Bob -- Original Message -- From: "Steve Hanberg" <steve@oldsub.com> To: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>; "oletrucks" <oletru; /html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00669.html (12,984 bytes)
10. Re: [oletrucks] Engine Weights (score: 1): Author: "Steve Hanberg" <steve@OldSub.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 14:11:32 -0700; Could be, but if ultimate performance is the goal you want a big V-8 anyway. That's a thought. But I understand the 302 head "breathes" a lot better. Bob -- Original Message -- From: "Steve Hanberg"; /html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00670.html (13,315 bytes)
11. Re: [oletrucks] Engine Weights (score: 1): Author: "DON" <ppm@accesscomm.ca>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 15:28:29 -0600; Hi Bob, That 292 will go like a scared rabbit, I have one {original} in a 65 GMC Canadian 1/2 ton. It is unreal will gain speed going up steep hills with no effort. Best regards to all, Don in Sask.; /html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00671.html (12,334 bytes)
12. Re: [oletrucks] Engine Weights (score: 1): Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 15:22:54 -0700; GGGRRREEEAAATTTT!! Bob no That of 1959 oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959; /html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00674.html (13,090 bytes)
13. Re: [oletrucks] Engine Weights (score: 1): Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 15:24:34 -0700; I'd like a mix of a little more power, plus stay away from the modern (more common) V-8's. Bob K anyway. Bob I my "oletrucks" That of 1959 oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 19; /html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00675.html (14,310 bytes)
14. Re: [oletrucks] Engine Weights (score: 1): Author: "Gary Perry" <glperry@fwi.com>; Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 10:45:03 -0500; Bob, those GMC engines are HUGE and HEAVY! I doubt it would be a good choice, and NO parts hardly for them. I've owned the smaller 305's and had problem with parts. In your search for a "different" a; /html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00720.html (11,343 bytes)
15. Re: [oletrucks] Engine Weights (score: 1): Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>; Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 12:35:23 -0700; Just found this photo, and had to share. This is a 3.9L Cummins in a Jeep. Looks factory!!http://montanajeepframes.com/customer/andy/andy7.jpg Bob K -- Original Message -- From: "Gary Perry" <glperry; /html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00760.html (12,362 bytes)
16. RE: [oletrucks] Engine Weights (score: 1): Author: "Thomas, Robert" <RThomas@ButteCounty.net>; Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 12:50:17 -0700; If you run through the numbers (i.e., ~andy.2.jpg; ~andy3.jpg), you get a better idea of the jeep itself. It is a '40 flat-fendered! I am amazed! Robert T. Just found this photo, and had to share. Th; /html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00761.html (12,802 bytes)
17. Re: [oletrucks] Engine Weights (score: 1): Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>; Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 13:55:42 -0700; Several years go I saw a 48 Chevy Suburban with a 3.9L Cummins. (I think in Custom Classic trucks). It looked like he had room for two more cylinders. Very nice job. Originally had a TH400, later put; /html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00763.html (14,007 bytes)
18. Re: [oletrucks] Engine Weights (score: 1): Author: jrdorsey <jrdorsey@strato.net>; Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 21:50:34 -0500; 216/235 at 630 lbs, and the BB chevy at 685 lbs. Basically what you said just a little more exact. I find it interesting that the old 6's fall right in the middle of the two 8's. Another interesting; /html/oletrucks/2003-02/msg00066.html (8,187 bytes)
19. [oletrucks] Engine weights (score: 1): Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>; Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 12:11:36 -0700; The V-345 in my 78 IH Scout weighs 745 lbs, so I can't believe the Chevy 6 could be anywhere near that. (The IH intake manifold alone weighs 90 lbs!) How much does the 235 engine weigh? Bob K in PHX,; /html/oletrucks/2001-10/msg00330.html (6,523 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 19
Page: [1]