Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+S10\s+4X4\s+Frame\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+S10\s+4X4\s+Frame\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [oletrucks] S10 4X4 Frame (score: 1): Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>; Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 21:35:05 -0700; Would a s10 4X4 frame work with a 49 GMC? Would a 292 engine fit? Bob K in oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959; /html/oletrucks/2003-12/msg00237.html (7,448 bytes)
2. RE: [oletrucks] S10 4X4 Frame (score: 1): Author: "Durwood B. Darbin" <dhckdkcsk@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 05:17:16 -0700; Why would you want to put an old engine in a new frame swap? I thought that the beauty of the frame swap was the modern engine, suspension, transmission, steering and other stuff in an OLD Pcup. The; /html/oletrucks/2003-12/msg00238.html (8,649 bytes)
3. RE: [oletrucks] S10 4X4 Frame (score: 1): Author: zman <zman@gibbon.kungfumonkey.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 08:41:07 -0500 (EST); If it's the long wheelbase S10 it shoud be correct. It is for my '59. I've been debating it myself. -- Scott H. Zekanis zman@kungfumonkey.com http://www.rod-o-rama.com http://www.thehellbenders.com 1; /html/oletrucks/2003-12/msg00239.html (8,347 bytes)
4. RE: [oletrucks] S10 4X4 Frame (score: 1): Author: "Andy Johns" <oldtruckguy@mindspring.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 10:04:15 -0500; Being one of the few that has actually done the S-10 swap, I guess i ought to throw in my 2 cents. The frame swap has its pros and cons. I put an 1988 S-10 long bed frame (but not 4x4) under my 1951; /html/oletrucks/2003-12/msg00240.html (9,834 bytes)
5. Re: [oletrucks] S10 4X4 Frame (score: 1): Author: "Steve Hanberg" <steve@OldSub.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 07:24:21 -0800; The S10 frame is easily shortened, so if you start with a long one, making it the right length is not a big deal. The 4x4 has a wider rear axle, and fits better than the 2wd rears do. The S10 guys ha; /html/oletrucks/2003-12/msg00242.html (8,215 bytes)
6. Re: [oletrucks] S10 4X4 Frame (score: 1): Author: Ie61pah@aol.com; Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 10:42:09 EST; Either you mismeasured, or I did. I measured one, considering that option for my '58. If I remember right, it was about 3-4 inches off. You could make it work, by moving the spring mounts, and notchi; /html/oletrucks/2003-12/msg00243.html (8,360 bytes)
7. Re: [oletrucks] S10 4X4 Frame (score: 1): Author: zman <zman@gibbon.kungfumonkey.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 11:09:25 -0500 (EST); The S10 chassis I have dealt with are either 108, 118, or 122.9 inches. The '59 should be 114 inches for the shortbed or 123.25 for the longbed. The longer S10 chassis works perfect for the longbed '; /html/oletrucks/2003-12/msg00244.html (8,938 bytes)
8. Re: [oletrucks] S10 4X4 Frame (score: 1): Author: zman <zman@gibbon.kungfumonkey.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 11:24:28 -0500 (EST); The only reason to move the engine back is to use an engine mounted fan or a puller electric. 4.3 mounts and a push fan and the v-8 sit in there real pretty. -- Scott H. Zekanis zman@kungfumonkey.com; /html/oletrucks/2003-12/msg00245.html (8,718 bytes)
9. Re: [oletrucks] S10 4X4 Frame (score: 1): Author: "Steve Hanberg" <steve@OldSub.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 08:26:54 -0800; I didn't know that. The only guy I've discussed the V-8 swap with moved the whole works backward to make it fit. I'm betting the 292 would require moving something to make it fit... -- Original Messa; /html/oletrucks/2003-12/msg00246.html (9,221 bytes)
10. RE: [oletrucks] S10 4X4 Frame (score: 1): Author: zman <zman@gibbon.kungfumonkey.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 11:28:05 -0500 (EST); The www.jagsthatrun.com motor mounts are a deal at $50 a pair. They will allow you to use an engine fan and shroud. -- Scott H. Zekanis zman@kungfumonkey.com http://www.rod-o-rama.com http://www.theh; /html/oletrucks/2003-12/msg00247.html (8,308 bytes)
11. Re: [oletrucks] S10 4X4 Frame (score: 1): Author: zman <zman@gibbon.kungfumonkey.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 11:30:12 -0500 (EST); Anytime you do anything like this it's gonna take a little finagleing. That's half the fun to me. IF it wasn't I'd pay someone to deal with it. But when your done you know you did it. I love the sati; /html/oletrucks/2003-12/msg00248.html (9,380 bytes)
12. Re: [oletrucks] S10 4X4 Frame (score: 1): Author: "Kerwin M Lehmann" <klehmann@bentonrea.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 10:12:47 -0800; That looks like a good outfit to keep track of, they sure have the engine mountings for the S-10 under control. But I think on you AD's & TF's you would want to mount your engine farther aft than the; /html/oletrucks/2003-12/msg00249.html (9,299 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]