Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+Shock\s+mounting\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+Shock\s+mounting\s+question\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [oletrucks] Shock mounting question (score: 1): Author: Ryan Sain <rsain@gte.net>; Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 08:55:12 -0700; This is on the 59. We have the TCI rear spring kit. With that came the shocks. I will need to build an upper mount and that is where my question lies. I have a good design however was wondering what; /html/oletrucks/2004-09/msg00051.html (7,153 bytes)
2. Re: [oletrucks] Shock mounting question (score: 1): Author: Ie61pah@aol.com; Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 17:08:25 EDT; Part of the reason for having the shock at an angle is to help with body roll in cornering. The other factor to think of is total shock travel. If your shock is straight up and down, it will require; /html/oletrucks/2004-09/msg00052.html (7,351 bytes)
3. Re: [oletrucks] Shock mounting question (score: 1): Author: Ryan Sain <rsain@gte.net>; Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 15:05:35 -0700; Thanks Pat. That9s exactly what I was thinking the angle was for. How about replicating the new Ford idea? Mount the shocks outside the frame rails - has anyone done this yet to their old chev? - Rya; /html/oletrucks/2004-09/msg00054.html (7,829 bytes)
4. Re: [oletrucks] Shock mounting question (score: 1): Author: "K. M. Lehmann" <klehmann@bentonrea.com>; Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 18:40:08 -0700; My '54 Chev came with the shocks outside. frame body your if just oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959; /html/oletrucks/2004-09/msg00056.html (8,450 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]