- 1. [oletrucks] Truck Engines (score: 1)
- Author: john j tonyes <flfox1@juno.com>
- Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2000 17:57:15 -0400
- Can some one tell me the difference between a 1952 Chevy and a 1952 GMC engine? I don't thing they were the same engine. John 50 Chevy 52 Chevy mine 54 Chevy hers oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM
- /html/oletrucks/2000-09/msg00056.html (6,754 bytes)
- 2. Re: [oletrucks] Truck Engines (score: 1)
- Author: "Brian Stephens" <intubated@earthlink.net>
- Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2000 21:24:02 -0500
- I am pretty sure the Chevy had a 216 "thriftmaster" engine, while the GMC had a 228. Probably other guys on the list can confirm this. Of course, we are talking about 1/2 ton trucks, right? Brian Ste
- /html/oletrucks/2000-09/msg00062.html (7,547 bytes)
- 3. Re: [oletrucks] Truck Engines (score: 1)
- Author: "Jack Halton" <safesix@earthlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 08:04:06 -0400
- While the Chevy and GMC do share a few parts (water pump, cam bearings, engine mounts) they are otherwise entirely different. GMC are full pressure oiling, Chevy are dip and splash. Jack Halton 51 GM
- /html/oletrucks/2000-09/msg00067.html (7,520 bytes)
- 4. Re: [oletrucks] Truck Engines (score: 1)
- Author: "David Handley" <dph55@pdq.net>
- Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 09:42:41 -0500
- The chevy in the half ton was a 216 babbitt bearing dip and splatter, sorry sort of lubrication system. The GMC had a real oiling system and was a 228 cubic inch . I believe GMC had full pressure oil
- /html/oletrucks/2000-09/msg00070.html (7,673 bytes)
- 5. [Oletrucks] Truck Engines (score: 1)
- Author: Bob Keeland <keelandb@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 17:48:38 -0700 (PDT)
- In the old truck magazines they seem to emphasize larger and larger engines. For my '51 I currently have an old 283, but I'm not sure that it is still any good. As I intend to use the truck for daily
- /html/oletrucks/2011-11/msg00020.html (7,264 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu