Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+flushing\s+engines\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+flushing\s+engines\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [oletrucks] flushing engines (score: 1): Author: Ben Bennett <greyhawk200@att.net>; Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2002 11:40:42 -0800; IMHO, That's almost the dumbest thing you could do to an engine. Think about it, one of the reasons for the oil is to be a layer between the bearing & crank. So you're going to take some kerosene or; /html/oletrucks/2002-03/msg00018.html (7,964 bytes)
2. Re: [oletrucks] flushing engines (score: 1): Author: "Tom Warner" <twwood@bellsouth.net>; Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2002 15:15:34 -0500; I Agree totally! When getting ready to start a new engine (rebuild or other wise), I have always built up oil pressure first, this fills the oil galleries,and forces a layer of oil into all of the cl; /html/oletrucks/2002-03/msg00020.html (9,180 bytes)
3. Re: [oletrucks] flushing engines (score: 1): Author: "Richard Reul" <rreul@gallatinriver.net>; Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2002 18:44:57 -0600; Well go ahead and get sick, because it was done quite often back in the 40's and 50's. Guess what, we are still driving these vehicles around. Couldn't of hurt them too bad. Rich Reul 1951 3604 Dixon; /html/oletrucks/2002-03/msg00025.html (8,795 bytes)
4. Re: [oletrucks] flushing engines (score: 1): Author: Ben Bennett <greyhawk200@att.net>; Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2002 17:23:25 -0800; I'm going to answer this because I feel so strongly about it. Here's hoping we don't get into a flame bout. Still driving these vehicles around? With the same bearings? I was around back in the 40's; /html/oletrucks/2002-03/msg00026.html (7,865 bytes)
5. Re: [oletrucks] flushing engines (score: 1): Author: "D" <ppm@accesscomm.ca>; Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2002 20:49:58 -0600; Just back from long extended holiday, reading this thread re: oiling. Have had several motors rebuilt and old guy who did them coated every surface that would touch another surface, with STP prior to; /html/oletrucks/2002-03/msg00029.html (9,726 bytes)
6. Re: [oletrucks] flushing engines (score: 1): Author: mark@noakes.com; Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2002 05:09:33 -0800 (PST); I thought all the commercial motor flushes were kerosene-based. If they did any serious engine damage, they would all be out of business by now. Mark Noakes oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM truck; /html/oletrucks/2002-03/msg00035.html (8,227 bytes)
7. RE: [oletrucks] flushing engines (score: 1): Author: "haist" <haist2@attbi.com>; Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 08:18:57 -0800; If you're really concerned about what's inside that old engine, take a half a day, drop the pan, look around inside, plastigauge a bearing or two, clean out the pan (and 90% of the yuck), put it back; /html/oletrucks/2002-03/msg00037.html (7,704 bytes)
8. Re: [oletrucks] flushing engines (score: 1): Author: john j tonyes <flfox1@juno.com>; Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 11:43:01 -0500; On Sun, 03 Mar 2002 11:40:42 -0800 Ben Bennett <greyhawk200@att.net> writes: John Tonyes, Coordinator,2002 USS TELFAIR APA 210 (53-54) SEE YOU IN ORLANDO, Fl. OCTOBER 4,5&,6, 2002 863 859 0878 oletr; /html/oletrucks/2002-03/msg00038.html (8,445 bytes)
9. Re: [oletrucks] flushing engines (score: 1): Author: "Richard Reul" <rreul@gallatinriver.net>; Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 14:04:43 -0600; Didn't mean to cause a stir, was just commenting on how they used to do it. It was quite a common practice here in the midwest. I suppose it was a cheap and easy way to flush your engine because of t; /html/oletrucks/2002-03/msg00045.html (10,500 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]