Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+rear\s+suspension\s+idea\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+rear\s+suspension\s+idea\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [oletrucks] rear suspension idea (score: 1): Author: "Richards, Troy" <TRichards@hrgreen.com>; Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 08:16:34 -0600; I've been kicking around ideas for the rear suspension on my 52 Chevy 1/2 ton. 4 link, parallel leaves, or a 3/4 elliptic setup? I really like the 3/4 elliptic idea but I don't know what springs to u; /html/oletrucks/2002-11/msg00041.html (7,297 bytes)
2. Re: [oletrucks] rear suspension idea (score: 1): Author: "Bob Chansler" <rchansle@us.ibm.com>; Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 15:44:17 -0700; I had another idea for the rear on my 49. I was going to cut the bracket from the old rear axle and weld it onto an axle I got out of a 74 Monte Carlo. The Monte had coil spring perches that I ground; /html/oletrucks/2002-11/msg00108.html (9,953 bytes)
3. Re: [oletrucks] rear suspension idea (score: 1): Author: "Gary Perry" <glperry@fwi.com>; Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 11:30:43 -0500; Bob, torque tubes had to allow axle to "roll" in operation. The front mount of driveshaft on them was a pivot. You wont have that with open drive and will want the rear to be solid to springs or it w; /html/oletrucks/2002-11/msg00123.html (10,532 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]