Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+vacuum\s+advance\s+\/\s+lines\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+vacuum\s+advance\s+\/\s+lines\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [oletrucks] vacuum advance / lines (score: 1): Author: "William M. Schickling" <wschick1@twcny.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 20:30:59 -0500; My winter project is to rebuild a 235 for my truck. I am putting a dual intake manifold on and was wondering about the vacuum lines. each carb has a spot for a vacuum line and the manifold has a spo; /html/oletrucks/2000-12/msg00320.html (7,767 bytes)
2. Re: [oletrucks] vacuum advance / lines (score: 1): Author: Passnb4U@aol.com; Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 21:33:22 EST; a You'll want to use one off the carb' ported vac., assuming you're using an original type distributor. If you use intake vacuum, then intial advance will be too much, and you'll get part throttle pi; /html/oletrucks/2000-12/msg00323.html (8,328 bytes)
3. Re: [oletrucks] vacuum advance / lines (score: 1): Author: "Allen Jones" <jonesal@u.washington.edu>; Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 12:58:22 -0800; I'm not sure I agree with that. With two carburetors, vacuum at the port at the base of the carburetor(s) will drop way off and you won't get near the advance you need. I highly recommend going with; /html/oletrucks/2000-12/msg00350.html (10,036 bytes)
4. RE: [oletrucks] vacuum advance / lines (score: 1): Author: "William M. Schickling" <wschick1@twcny.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 18:31:35 -0500; I printed out a couple pages from the web (Sorry, I'll have to go look up the URL) from someone that describes the modification your are talking about. First you knock out some plugs then drill out; /html/oletrucks/2000-12/msg00355.html (11,124 bytes)
5. Re: [oletrucks] vacuum advance / lines (score: 1): Author: "Allen Jones" <jonesal@u.washington.edu>; Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 15:58:12 -0800; As I am running Rochester's, yes, I have drilled the holes out (modified the off idle circuit(s)). Plugs eventually go back in (a lead plug on the inside and an aluminum plug on the outside, if I rem; /html/oletrucks/2000-12/msg00356.html (13,237 bytes)
6. RE: [oletrucks] vacuum advance / lines (score: 1): Author: "William M. Schickling" <wschick1@twcny.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 21:20:53 -0500; Thanks. It will be a while before I'm ready to make these changes. I haven't decided whether to try porting the head or not. I have the 848 casting and I've heard that's a pretty good head to start; /html/oletrucks/2000-12/msg00362.html (14,113 bytes)
7. Re: [oletrucks] vacuum advance / lines (score: 1): Author: "Allen Jones" <jonesal@u.washington.edu>; Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 10:57:59 -0800; The 848 head gives you the highest compression ratio using a stock set-up. You can really boost up the compression with pop-up pistons, but that's another story. I decked the head a bit to get a litt; /html/oletrucks/2000-12/msg00380.html (16,729 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]