Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*10\.7\.51\s+of\s+the\s+CA\.\s+motor\s+vehicle\s+code\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*10\.7\.51\s+of\s+the\s+CA\.\s+motor\s+vehicle\s+code\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. 10.7.51 of the CA. motor vehicle code (score: 1): Author: Vonski@aol.com; Date: Mon, 12 May 1997 18:09:24 -0400 (EDT); It is illegal to remove or alter the vin # of a motor vehicle.....Should an altered vin # be encountered (which includes method of attachment) at best the tag is seized, and a state tag will be place; /html/tigers/1997-05/msg00141.html (9,472 bytes)
2. Re: 10.7.51 of the CA. motor vehicle code (score: 1): Author: Marc James Small <msmall@roanoke.infi.net>; Date: Mon, 12 May 1997 21:31:39 -0400; Pray, spare us what some cop tells you the law may be. An owner -- under FEDERAL law, which over-rides state law on this point -- may remove a VIN tag for the purposes of restoration. Period. In any; /html/tigers/1997-05/msg00148.html (8,560 bytes)
3. Re: 10.7.51 of the CA. motor vehicle code (score: 1): Author: Vonski@aol.com; Date: Tue, 13 May 1997 14:00:13 -0400 (EDT); This is intended for those who are considering doing a full restoration, and who want to take the serial number plate off the cowl. Obviously I was unclear yesterday. In an effort to determine the ac; /html/tigers/1997-05/msg00163.html (11,774 bytes)
4. 10.7.51 of the CA. motor vehicle code (score: 1): Author: "Kempinski, Robert M." <RKEMPINS@SSF4.jsc.nasa.gov>; Date: Tue, 13 May 1997 13:48:00 -0500; Interesting info - where were you 6 years ago when I used the old 1/4 in bit to drill them out? And how about getting a car dipped? Is there no provisionin the law for that. Getting a new VIN would; /html/tigers/1997-05/msg00165.html (8,237 bytes)
5. RE: 10.7.51 of the CA. motor vehicle code (score: 1): Author: "Richard Atherton (Entex)" <a-richat@MICROSOFT.com>; Date: Wed, 14 May 1997 04:49:27 -0700; You said that not having documents is bad. What other documents other than a title for the car would be needed? Rich; /html/tigers/1997-05/msg00188.html (13,775 bytes)
6. Re: 10.7.51 of the CA. motor vehicle code (score: 1): Author: d_mountjoy@mail.nmusd.k12.ca.us (Darrell Mountjoy); Date: Wed, 14 May 1997 10:28:46 -0800; Just a small correction here: Ford did not follow this methodology for vehicle i.d., atleast with the Y-block cars of '55, '56 &'57. Unlike Chevy (& maybe all GM??) who matched a serial number on mo; /html/tigers/1997-05/msg00200.html (9,786 bytes)
7. Re: 10.7.51 of the CA. motor vehicle code (score: 1): Author: HW200@aol.com; Date: Wed, 14 May 1997 19:28:13 -0400 (EDT); Marc hit the nail on the head. We are not talking stolen vehicles, we are talking 30 year old restored vehicles, ones that most CHP officers find interesting not suspicious. hank; /html/tigers/1997-05/msg00207.html (7,943 bytes)
8. Re: 10.7.51 of the CA. motor vehicle code (score: 1): Author: HW200@aol.com; Date: Wed, 14 May 1997 19:29:36 -0400 (EDT); basically because there was no standardized method for affixing VIN plates for all makes and models during the time Tigers were built, you are saying it does not apply (your verse about removal)???; /html/tigers/1997-05/msg00208.html (7,976 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]