Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*1275s\s+in\s+Bugeyes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*1275s\s+in\s+Bugeyes\s*$/: 29 ]

Total 29 documents matching your query.

1. Re: 1275s in Bugeyes (score: 1): Author: Mark Haynes <haynes386@netzero.net>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 19:27:49 -0600; David- What are you doing running a '74 Midget anyway? That doesn't fit into the 'vintage pre-'67' rules, does it? Mark Haynes RMVR (square-nose, 948) /// unsubscribe/change address requests to major; /html/vintage-race/2003-06/msg00019.html (6,993 bytes)
2. Re: 1275s in Bugeyes (score: 1): Author: JWoesvra@aol.com; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 12:54:17 EDT; Mark, David's Midget has a 1974 chassis that is backdated to earlier specifications. It is a legal SVRA car and we use 1967 as the specification line for these cars. Under period SCCA regulations a c; /html/vintage-race/2003-06/msg00021.html (7,724 bytes)
3. 1275s in Bugeyes (score: 1): Author: dmeadow@juno.com; Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 15:58:16 GMT; A friend of mine just had a Bugeye rejected for the Gold Cup Historics at VIR because it has a 1275 in it. I'm told that the SCCA never sanctioned 1275s in Bugeyes, so they are not vintage eligible.; /html/vintage-race/2003-05/msg00043.html (8,770 bytes)
4. Re: 1275s in Bugeyes (score: 1): Author: Doug Meis <s800racer@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 12:41:01 -0500; 1275cc Bugeyes are not looked upon with favor (& were never recognized by SCCA) because the "Bugeye" bodystyle was never fitted with a 1275cc engine. It is simply a grossly over-sized motor for that; /html/vintage-race/2003-05/msg00045.html (8,714 bytes)
5. Re: 1275s in Bugeyes (score: 1): Author: WSpohn4@aol.com; Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 13:11:46 EDT; While I don't disagree with your sentiment, the Bugeye example is a bit less egregious than you indicate, as the engine is a later version of the 948 (via 1098) that WAS used in the car. Your example; /html/vintage-race/2003-05/msg00046.html (9,463 bytes)
6. RE: 1275s in Bugeyes (score: 1): Author: Sadek Charles H DLVA <SadekCH@nswc.navy.mil>; Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 13:43:38 -0400; David and Others, I think part of the problem is, where do you place a car that has an oversize-significantly in some cases, engine? For example, say an SVRA Grp 6 '68 Camaro shows up with a big bloc; /html/vintage-race/2003-05/msg00048.html (9,597 bytes)
7. RE: 1275s in Bugeyes (score: 1): Author: "Wm. Severin Thompson" <wsthompson@thicko.com>; Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 13:35:50 -0500; Of course, a 1275 Bugeye'd really open a can-o-whupass on a Honda... ;) I've got to go with Bill's sentiments here. Since I've got 10 Spridgets in various street and racing trim, I hope that qualifie; /html/vintage-race/2003-05/msg00049.html (12,387 bytes)
8. Re: 1275s in Bugeyes (score: 1): Author: Bill McLeod <wbmcleod@cox.net>; Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 11:55:38 -0700; VARA, in California routinely runs 1275 bugeyes (in fact I have one in my shop). The Northern California sanctioning body does, as well, and I believe the Rocky Mountain vintage race organization doe; /html/vintage-race/2003-05/msg00051.html (9,668 bytes)
9. Re: 1275s in Bugeyes (score: 1): Author: Richard Newton <rfn026@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 12:04:03 -0700 (PDT); Gee - If they keep this up we'll have to take the 427 cid small block out of the car. Seriously though there aren't many Corvettes that could pass a cubic inch test. Why are the poor Sprites getting; /html/vintage-race/2003-05/msg00052.html (8,312 bytes)
10. Re: 1275s in Bugeyes (score: 1): Author: Richard Newton <rfn026@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 12:04:40 -0700 (PDT); Gee - If they keep this up we'll have to take the 427 cid small block out of the car. Seriously though there aren't many Corvettes that could pass a cubic inch test. Why are the poor Sprites getting; /html/vintage-race/2003-05/msg00053.html (8,447 bytes)
11. Re: 1275s in Bugeyes (score: 1): Author: MHKitchen@aol.com; Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 15:30:19 EDT; You may want to confirm this... I believe CSRG does NOT accept a Bugeye with a 1275, but they WILL accept the appropriate year MG Midget or non-Bugeye Sprite which DID originally come with a 1275 (19; /html/vintage-race/2003-05/msg00055.html (8,810 bytes)
12. Re: 1275s in Bugeyes (score: 1): Author: Doug Meis <s800racer@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 15:42:10 -0500; It seems to me that this is a common sentiment that comes out whenever there is a discussion of rules issues. It is often casually stated that so many cars run oversize engines. While I am sure that; /html/vintage-race/2003-05/msg00056.html (10,016 bytes)
13. Re: 1275s in Bugeyes (score: 1): Author: WSpohn4@aol.com; Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 15:54:09 EDT; We had a 215 Buick powered car locally built in the early 60s - would that qualify to run .. ;-) Bill /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.ne; /html/vintage-race/2003-05/msg00057.html (8,524 bytes)
14. Re: 1275s in Bugeyes (score: 1): Author: WSpohn4@aol.com; Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 16:00:43 EDT; Fact - almost zero Tigers run a 260, even though there were more of them than 289s - allowable I assume because the later cars actually came with that engine. Fact - almost no Ford GT40s run original; /html/vintage-race/2003-05/msg00058.html (8,927 bytes)
15. Re: 1275s in Bugeyes (score: 1): Author: edm@AdServices.com; Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 13:18:12 -0700; Thank you Doug, I definitely see a lot of finger pointing and rumours abound at events, but after 5 years of active rules enforcement on period configuration and displacement, SOVREN has tried very h; /html/vintage-race/2003-05/msg00059.html (9,489 bytes)
16. Re: 1275s in Bugeyes (score: 1): Author: dmeadow@juno.com; Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 20:35:53 GMT; I understand your point, Doug, although "the wrong motor for the car" isn't really the rule. In fact, you can race (and the SCCA allowed) any square-body spridget with a 1275, whether it came with on; /html/vintage-race/2003-05/msg00060.html (11,398 bytes)
17. RE: 1275s in Bugeyes (score: 1): Author: <rickyocum@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 18:31:04 -0700; David and Others, I think part of the problem is, where do you place a car that has an oversize-significantly in some cases, engine? For example, say an SVRA Grp 6 '68 Camaro shows up with a big bloc; /html/vintage-race/2003-05/msg00065.html (9,644 bytes)
18. Re: 1275s in Bugeyes (score: 1): Author: Bill McLeod <wbmcleod@cox.net>; Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 17:14:41 -0700; We ran at Sonoma almost (WOW!) 10 years ago, and in all fairness, the bugeye may still have had the 948 with which it started. So, I may well be mistaken (read wrong). Where did those years go? Bill; /html/vintage-race/2003-05/msg00069.html (11,492 bytes)
19. Re: 1275s in Bugeyes (score: 1): Author: Doug Meis <s800racer@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 21:19:10 -0400; I have no problem at all with 1275 motors in square body sprites. That's always been accepted by everyone including the SCCA 35 years ago. -- Doug Meis <s800racer@earthlink.net> /// unsubscribe/chang; /html/vintage-race/2003-05/msg00071.html (9,331 bytes)
20. RE: 1275s in Bugeyes (score: 1): Author: Sadek Charles H DLVA <SadekCH@nswc.navy.mil>; Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 22:16:42 -0400; Always someone who shoots holes in my argument... <VBG> Chuck S /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Archives at htt; /html/vintage-race/2003-05/msg00072.html (10,445 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]