Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*1st\s+Gear\s+Synchro\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*1st\s+Gear\s+Synchro\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: 1st Gear Synchro (score: 1): Author: Bobsoniaharris@aol.com; Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 10:31:24 EDT; Everything I have read the TR3B was produced at the same time as the TR4, two reasons, one to use up old TR3 parts, 2nd US dealers still wanted a "traditional" sports car to sell. My understanding as; /html/healeys/2005-10/msg00026.html (7,348 bytes)
2. 1st Gear Synchro (score: 1): Author: STEV0001@aol.com; Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 18:37:51 EDT; At the risk of once again proving my limited knowledge re: this wonderful, little car I must ask - Should the Series III BJ-8 have synchromesh into 1st gear? Steve G. Benicia, CA 1979 MGB L/E; /html/healeys/2005-09/msg00854.html (6,898 bytes)
3. Re: 1st Gear Synchro (score: 1): Author: MBran89793@aol.com; Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 18:53:33 EDT; Should the Series III BJ-8 have synchromesh into 1st gear? No. Non synchromesh first gears were standard. Marion S. Brantley, Jr. 727/867-7129 Tampa Bay Austin-Healey Club Membership Chairman _http:/; /html/healeys/2005-09/msg00855.html (7,311 bytes)
4. Re: 1st Gear Synchro (score: 1): Author: David Nock <healeydoc@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 16:20:05 -0700; First gear is not a syncro gear. So always put it into second gear before going into first or reverse. This will stop the gears inside the gear box and make it easier to go into first gear. David No; /html/healeys/2005-09/msg00857.html (7,507 bytes)
5. Re: 1st Gear Synchro (score: 1): Author: "Greg Lemon" <glemon@neb.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 18:08:02 -0500; "Should the Series III BJ-8 have synchromesh into 1st gear?" Should it?, well considering the lower priced Triumph went to an all synchro box with the TR4 in '61 it probably should have, but it it di; /html/healeys/2005-09/msg00862.html (7,060 bytes)
6. Re: 1st Gear Synchro (score: 1): Author: "Dick Matson" <MedLabInc@msn.com>; Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 20:44:48 -0700; Even earlier for Triumph, the claim of the TR3-B was an all-synchro Dick Matson / Cashmere, WA Bj8 -- Original Message -- From: Greg Lemon<mailto:glemon@neb.rr.com> To: healey List<mailto:healeys@aut; /html/healeys/2005-09/msg00873.html (7,492 bytes)
7. Re: 1st Gear Synchro (score: 1): Author: Bobsoniaharris@aol.com; Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 08:06:20 EDT; Even earlier for Triumph, the claim of the TR3-B was an all-synchro transmission. Dick Matson / Cashmere, WA Bj8 -- Original Message -- From: Greg Lemon<mailto:glemon@neb.rr.com> To: healey List<mail; /html/healeys/2005-09/msg00886.html (8,084 bytes)
8. Re: 1st Gear Synchro (score: 1): Author: "Dick Matson" <MedLabInc@msn.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 09:34:20 -0700; Question: Were TR3 B and TR4 produced at the same time or did the TR4 follow the TR3 ? Even earlier for Triumph, the claim of the TR3-B was an all-synchro transmission. Dick Matson / Cashmere, WA Bj8; /html/healeys/2005-09/msg00896.html (7,998 bytes)
9. Re: 1st Gear Synchro (score: 1): Author: "Greg Lemon" <glemon@neb.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 11:51:09 -0500; Everything I have read the TR3B was produced at the same time as the TR4, two reasons, one to use up old TR3 parts, 2nd US dealers still wanted a "traditional" sports car to sell. My understanding as; /html/healeys/2005-09/msg00902.html (7,251 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]