Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Aerodynamics\s+Vs\.\s+time\s+slips\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Aerodynamics\s+Vs\.\s+time\s+slips\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. Aerodynamics Vs. time slips (score: 1): Author: W S Potter <wester6935@attbi.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 09:51:12 -0800; What Howard doesn't claim (or modestly doesn't bring up) is something I feel needs to be mentioned here. And ... it ain't braggin' if ya done it! Howard and Bryan, correct me if I'm wrong, but I seem; /html/land-speed/2003-01/msg00673.html (8,723 bytes)
2. RE: Aerodynamics Vs. time slips (score: 1): Author: "Clay, Dale" <Dale.Clay@mdhelicopters.com>; Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 11:38:23 -0700; Now THAT is an accomplishment!!! Wonder if anybody else can say something like that? And nearly doubling the existing record? Big salute from here, Howard. Dale C. Howard and Bryan, correct me if I'm; /html/land-speed/2003-01/msg00866.html (8,935 bytes)
3. Re: Aerodynamics Vs. time slips (score: 1): Author: Nt788@aol.com; Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 16:43:44 EST; << And nearly doubling the existing record? Big salute from here, Howard. >> Costella -Yaccoucci 292 from 215. Nafger- Savage 254 from 195 Right? Jack /// unsubscribe/change address requests to major; /html/land-speed/2003-01/msg00868.html (8,114 bytes)
4. Re: Aerodynamics Vs. time slips (score: 1): Author: "Nafzger" <nafzger@vtc.net>; Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 19:17:53 -0700; 256 from 146 or 110 mph. Howard /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/land-s; /html/land-speed/2003-01/msg00878.html (8,733 bytes)
5. Re: Aerodynamics Vs. time slips (score: 1): Author: Nt788@aol.com; Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 02:40:43 EST; << Jack, 256 from 146 or 110 mph. Howard 1988 I/GS Lingua Bros. and Father 194.966. 1988 I/S Vescos Sport Center 193.390 2000 FIA 78mph Costella /True 2001 253.786 Jack /// unsubscribe/change address; /html/land-speed/2003-01/msg00885.html (8,376 bytes)
6. Re: Aerodynamics Vs. time slips (score: 1): Author: Nt788@aol.com; Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 12:40:09 EST; << What is this? Bragging about grabbing soft records? Just wondering Tom, Redding CA - #216 D/GCC...190.00 mph minimum to 229.737 mph Nt788@aol.com wrote: >> One of my very best qualities, besides b; /html/land-speed/2003-01/msg00899.html (8,512 bytes)
7. Re: Aerodynamics Vs. time slips (score: 1): Author: bernie brown <bernien2@swbell.net>; Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 15:50:59 -0600; You left off modest-Modest to a fault! LOL BB Nt788@aol.com wrote: >> is /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Archi; /html/land-speed/2003-01/msg00908.html (8,590 bytes)
8. Re: Aerodynamics Vs. time slips (score: 1): Author: Glenn Ridlen <gridlen@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 14:29:47 -0800 (PST); It's Jack's day in the barrel bernie brown <bernien2@swbell.net> wrote:Jack You left off modest-Modest to a fault! LOL BB Nt788@aol.com wrote: >> is -- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Aff; /html/land-speed/2003-01/msg00910.html (8,960 bytes)
9. Re: Aerodynamics Vs. time slips (score: 1): Author: "Nafzger" <nafzger@vtc.net>; Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 20:25:38 -0700; Whatever you say. My new motto: " Arguments are like parties, you do not have to attend everyone you are invited to" Howard /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try; /html/land-speed/2003-01/msg00918.html (9,548 bytes)
10. Re: Aerodynamics Vs. time slips (score: 1): Author: W S Potter <wester6935@attbi.com>; Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 07:07:23 -0800; All this "non bragging" (under the premise that it Ain't Braggin If Ya Done It!) begs my original point. I could care less about how great an increase there was in the record speed. That's John Rains; /html/land-speed/2003-01/msg00926.html (10,936 bytes)
11. Re: Aerodynamics Vs. time slips (score: 1): Author: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 09:48:39 -0500; Yes John Goodman 1992 to 1998 every run faster than the last. a new record every time the car was run.. The second license pass as a G/GL was over the record and we delined the run as we only used 2; /html/land-speed/2003-01/msg00928.html (9,923 bytes)
12. Re: Aerodynamics Vs. time slips (score: 1): Author: Nt788@aol.com; Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 12:04:39 EST; << But none of them have made all those runs in sequence with a faster time EVERY time down the salt that I remember. Jack, Please correct me if I'm wrong. Wes >> Consistency is very hard I wish I ha; /html/land-speed/2003-01/msg00933.html (9,186 bytes)
13. Re: Aerodynamics Vs. time slips (score: 1): Author: Nt788@aol.com; Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 12:07:49 EST; << What catagorey would posting a record run on an open record fall under--pride, ego stroking, bragging complaining--lol sparky >> How about creative? jack /// unsubscribe/change address requests to; /html/land-speed/2003-01/msg00935.html (9,107 bytes)
14. Re: Aerodynamics Vs. time slips (score: 1): Author: Nt788@aol.com; Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 12:08:53 EST; << Running on those open records is a nasty job but somebody's got to do it. Glenn >> Ain't it the truth! Jack /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://ww; /html/land-speed/2003-01/msg00936.html (9,153 bytes)
15. Re: Aerodynamics Vs. time slips (score: 1): Author: Nt788@aol.com; Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 12:44:02 EST; List. If I may I would like to emershlize on a mature controvershall subject please. In the spirit of our great amateur sport LSR I would like to say that putting to much emphasis on delaying the eve; /html/land-speed/2003-01/msg00940.html (9,486 bytes)
16. Re: Aerodynamics Vs. time slips (score: 1): Author: John Szalay <john.szalay@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 14:16:42 -0500; One of the reasons we volunteered at the Finals, saw a need and offered .. plan to do the same at WOS & Finals this year.. .--. 7_ GMC <Not> Louisville Ky | http://home.att.net/~john.szalay Zz zZ /,`; /html/land-speed/2003-01/msg00947.html (10,198 bytes)
17. Re: Aerodynamics Vs. time slips (score: 1): Author: Joe Amo <jkamo@rap.midco.net>; Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 23:33:54 -0700; yeah cuz I was thinkin all my list friends might not be impressed if I was to show up and run only 2 mph over Al T's 409 record on the first two attempts, then bust somthin on the motor then have to; /html/land-speed/2003-01/msg00960.html (11,172 bytes)
18. Re: Aerodynamics Vs. time slips (score: 1): Author: "dpulju" <dpulju@usintouch.com>; Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 07:22:21 -0800; I guess you have to be into setting records. Not self gratification. sunny and 45 in Pahrump -- Original Message -- From: "Joe Amo" <jkamo@rap.midco.net> To: "Russel Mack" <rtmack@concentric.net> Cc:; /html/land-speed/2003-01/msg00968.html (10,893 bytes)
19. Re: Aerodynamics Vs. time slips (score: 1): Author: Nt788@aol.com; Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 14:05:48 EST; << One of the reasons we volunteered at the Finals, saw a need and offered .. plan to do the same at WOS & Finals this year.. The absolute best solution! Jack /// unsubscribe/change address requests; /html/land-speed/2003-01/msg00991.html (8,528 bytes)
20. Re: Aerodynamics Vs. time slips (score: 1): Author: Nt788@aol.com; Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 14:12:04 EST; << o me there is an important difference between choosing an "oddball" racing class (with an open record because nobody else cares) and setting a new record at... say... 32mph-- and choosing a more "; /html/land-speed/2003-01/msg00993.html (8,667 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]