Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*April\s+Fast\s+Track\s+shock\s+proposals\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*April\s+Fast\s+Track\s+shock\s+proposals\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. April Fast Track shock proposals (score: 1): Author: Jeff Cashmore <cashmo@spec-rx7.org>; Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2002 11:00:33 -0600; http://www.scca.org/news/fastrack/02-04.pdf Since I'm about to buy new shocks these proposals are of great interest to me. My first concern is that item four's 1/4 inch dimension will make a lot of c; /html/autox/2002-03/msg00215.html (7,631 bytes)
2. Re: April Fast Track shock proposals (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 12:48:24 EST; Realize that most body lengths that will become illegal are too short, not too long. A spacer can be attached to the top of the body to bring it within 1/4". Charlie Davis /// unsubscribe/change addr; /html/autox/2002-03/msg00216.html (7,502 bytes)
3. Re: April Fast Track shock proposals (score: 1): Author: TeamZ06@aol.com; Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 21:03:33 EST; It will be immaterial as a shorter body is almost always accompanied by a shorter shaft. It's a packaging constraint. So even if you add a spacer to the body the shaft length/travel range will still; /html/autox/2002-03/msg00224.html (7,299 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]