Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*B\s+vrs\.\s+C\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*B\s+vrs\.\s+C\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: B vrs. C (score: 1): Author: "Roger Garnett" <rwg1@cornell.edu>; Date: Tue, 26 Nov 1996 11:17:07 -0500; Engine, heh. Diff- I think the ratios are 3.01 and 3.3 as opposed to the B's 3.9. The rear end casing may be different as well? Prop shaft. Tranny- beefier gears, changed bellhousing? (If this tranny; /html/mgs/1996-11/msg01572.html (7,878 bytes)
2. Re: B vrs. C (score: 1): Author: Robert Allen <boballen@sky.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Nov 1996 11:23:19 +0000; Nope. Same case. 3.07 (early, rare) and 3.70 axle ratios vs 'B' 3.90. The brakes and backing plate are different, however. Same. Nope. Bellhousing (and, thus, the case) is unique to 'C' but internals; /html/mgs/1996-11/msg01604.html (7,003 bytes)
3. Re: B vrs. C (score: 1): Author: Robert Allen <boballen@sky.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Nov 1996 11:10:59 -0600; Hmm, got me to thinking and I went to the books. My C/GT is a splined-hub car so I have to research the 5-bolt versus 4-bolt. All the 'original' books show disc wheel 'C's with these dumpy hubcaps s; /html/mgs/1996-11/msg01696.html (9,037 bytes)
4. B vrs. C (score: 1): Author: wzehring@cmb.biosci.wayne.edu (Will Zehring); Date: Fri, 26 Jan 1996 08:43:59 -0500; Fellow fiends: I have wondered for sometime about the essential differences between the B and the C. I feel like I'm walking a thin line here as its been my impression that the C, while perhaps a goo; /html/mgs/1996-01/msg00654.html (7,648 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]