Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*BN1\s+Rear\s+Springs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*BN1\s+Rear\s+Springs\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. BN1 Rear Springs (score: 1): Author: Awgertoo@aol.com; Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 15:37:36 EST; I've heard conflicting reports on the quality of rear springs supplied by Moss--has anyone seen their product in the last six months? Also, in view of the difficulty removing the old parts that many; /html/healeys/2005-03/msg00725.html (6,713 bytes)
2. Re: BN1 Rear Springs (score: 1): Author: Douglas W Flagg <dwflagg@juno.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 17:19:54 -0500; There was also the recent question about the choke cable purchased from M**s and that fact that it was way too short. I had an experience where a part was not even close. Their response was to give m; /html/healeys/2005-03/msg00728.html (8,049 bytes)
3. Re: BN1 Rear Springs (score: 1): Author: "Rich C" <richchrysler@quickclic.net>; Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 09:54:47 -0500; Doug Flagg wrote<snip> Perhaps the concours committee should set standards for repro Doug, and all, The simple fact is that when judging, if a repro part is indistinguishable from the original part,; /html/healeys/2005-03/msg00764.html (7,016 bytes)
4. Re: BN1 Rear Springs (score: 1): Author: Patton Dickson <57healey@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 09:23:23 -0600; Too bad we can't get a list of certified reproduction parts. I like Ed's known bad parts, AKA House of Horrors, on justbrits.com (http://www.justbrits.com/odd.html). There are also a bunch of parts t; /html/healeys/2005-03/msg00766.html (7,843 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]