Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Best\s+Carbs\s+for\s+MG\?\?\?\s+What\s+about\s+the\s+manifold\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Best\s+Carbs\s+for\s+MG\?\?\?\s+What\s+about\s+the\s+manifold\?\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Best Carbs for MG??? What about the manifold? (score: 1): Author: "Neil Cotty" <neilc@tradesrv.com.au>; Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1998 01:22:20 +1000; Can we talk about inlet manifolds?! :) As SU manifolds are virtually straight shot into the siamese ports of the std B head, whereas a single Weber uses a bent manifold (long and short), what _tangi; /html/mgs/1999-05/msg00016.html (9,435 bytes)
2. Re: Best Carbs for MG??? What about the manifold? (score: 1): Author: Charley & Peggy Robinson <ccrobins@ktc.com>; Date: Sat, 01 May 1999 15:00:43 -0500; Looked at the pic. Nice and neet. The first thing I noticed about the induction setup was the long tubes on the intake manifold. What's deal on that? Ram effect in the midrange? Better mixing? Both?; /html/mgs/1999-05/msg00031.html (10,266 bytes)
3. Re: Best Carbs for MG??? What about the manifold? (score: 1): Author: "Lawrie Alexander" <Lawrie@britcars.com>; Date: Sat, 1 May 1999 14:27:14 -0700; I'm afraid your multi-paragraph question lost me somewhere so I guess the answer is - No, we can't talk about manifolds. Actually, the theory you reference makes sense to me - a straight manifold sh; /html/mgs/1999-05/msg00037.html (10,925 bytes)
4. Re: Best Carbs for MG??? What about the manifold? (score: 1): Author: "Neil Cotty" <neilc@tradesrv.com.au>; Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1998 08:38:47 +1000; An experiment, thats what I heard - not my car y'see. No thats the Oil Catch can! :) Mandatory on all race cars here. Cheers, Neil.; /html/mgs/1999-05/msg00039.html (7,628 bytes)
5. Re: Best Carbs for MG??? What about the manifold? (score: 1): Author: Bud Krueger <bkrueger@ici.net>; Date: Sat, 01 May 1999 20:54:02 -0700; That's funny, Charley, first thing I spotted was the odd heater box and Bud Krueger 77MGB (sans heat last winter); /html/mgs/1999-05/msg00048.html (7,909 bytes)
6. Re: Best Carbs for MG??? What about the manifold? (score: 1): Author: Charley & Peggy Robinson <ccrobins@ktc.com>; Date: Sat, 01 May 1999 20:07:11 -0500; Hah! All according to you sensitization (G) I guess. I opened the .jpg to look at carburetion. CR; /html/mgs/1999-05/msg00049.html (7,589 bytes)
7. Re: Best Carbs for MG??? What about the manifold? (score: 1): Author: Jurgen Hartwig <gt0003a@prism.gatech.edu>; Date: Sun, 02 May 1999 18:33:28 -0400; Long, big runners for the manifold help at higher rpms, since they permit greater flow, as common sense would suggest. The turbulence generated by the losses from a bending pipe helps to keep and ind; /html/mgs/1999-05/msg00102.html (8,522 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]