Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Boreing\s+Cylinders\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Boreing\s+Cylinders\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Boreing Cylinders (score: 1): Author: "Gregg Baker" <gbaker@customcpu.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 20:57:11 -0800; I'm rebuilding my 69 MGB and am going to need to bore my cylinders. The cylinders have already been bored .030 and I'm wondering about going to .040 or even .060. I see Moss has pistons that are.060; /html/mgs/2003-04/msg00498.html (7,375 bytes)
2. RE: Boreing Cylinders (score: 1): Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 08:33:55 -0700; I don't have the specifics, but the 1950cc oversize pistons are substantially larger than +60 over. The B series engine is usually ok at +60, which is why the piston is supplied. I did have an engin; /html/mgs/2003-04/msg00502.html (8,093 bytes)
3. Re: Boreing Cylinders (score: 1): Author: Chris Thompson <ct-mg@cthompson.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 11:47:21 -0400; Gregg, I've asked the same question here before. The reaction was mixed. The 1950cc engine is an 83mm bore. which is considerably more than .060, if I'm not mistaken. The pistons for sale by Moss and; /html/mgs/2003-04/msg00503.html (8,652 bytes)
4. RE: Boreing Cylinders (score: 1): Author: "Larry Hoy" <list@marketvalue.net>; Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 12:16:53 -0600; .040 isn't a problem, ever. .060 probably isn't a problem. .080 and .100 should be sonic tested first, and you better have a good machine shop. Most MG blocks can be bored that much. The 1950 engine; /html/mgs/2003-04/msg00505.html (7,799 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]