Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Cartridge\s+or\s+Spin\s+On\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Cartridge\s+or\s+Spin\s+On\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Cartridge or Spin On? (score: 1): Author: "davidwjones" <davidwjones@cox.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 14:01:43 -0400; Recent discussion of the quality of various brands and types of spin on oil filters, combined with the discussion of ongoing longevity have me wondering. I'm well aware of the convenience and "mess"; /html/healeys/2006-04/msg00605.html (7,262 bytes)
2. Re: Cartridge or Spin On? (score: 1): Author: "Richard Bittmann" <edmyed@harbornet.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 12:35:35 -0700; I'm following the originality path and recently bought a Crosland felt filter element plus other parts which were available. I'm still missing some parts for the filter however and am asking here if; /html/healeys/2006-04/msg00607.html (8,894 bytes)
3. Re: Cartridge or Spin On? (score: 1): Author: <bighealey@charter.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 13:04:00 -0700; Keen observation. I chose the superior quality afforded by the K&N technology coupled with the anti-flowback. The ease that a spin on affords is a bonus, a big bonus. Trying to "fake" originality. I; /html/healeys/2006-04/msg00611.html (8,383 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]