- 1. Castor adjustability (score: 1)
- Author: "Philip S Jones" <philip.s.jones@attbi.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 19:44:56 -0800
- Hello listers. I appreciate this opportunity to appeal to your collective wisdom. This message is in regards to my '72 MGBGT. A while ago I had the lower A-arms replaced; and when I later switched ti
- /html/mgs/2002-11/msg00351.html (8,048 bytes)
- 2. Re: Castor adjustability (score: 1)
- Author: Bullwinkle <yd3@nvc.net>
- Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 00:01:08 -0600
- <<<snip>>> A while ago I had the lower A-arms replaced; <<<snip>>> There's your problem. Castor is the forward or rearward tilt of the "king pin" axis. If the A arms weren't correctly installed or o
- /html/mgs/2002-11/msg00355.html (6,931 bytes)
- 3. Re: Castor adjustability (score: 1)
- Author: "Telewest \(PH\)" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 09:35:21 -0000
- I was luckier. I changed mine *because* it was pulling to one side slightly and 'bonging' when going to full lock when stationary, new arms and bushes cured both. Mind you, having done the V8 I now n
- /html/mgs/2002-11/msg00357.html (9,137 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu