- 1. Re: Changing from 4.22 to 3.909 diff (score: 1)
- Author: Bkitterer@aol.com
- Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1999 03:01:16 EST
- We changed ours several months ago and while not a dramatic difference we are pleased with the results. A tad slower getting away but the few hundred rpm drop at seventy is nice. We have a stock 127
- /html/spridgets/1999-01/msg00002.html (6,962 bytes)
- 2. Re: Changing from 4.22 to 3.909 diff (score: 1)
- Author: ric_bergstrom@juno.com
- Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1999 08:52:55 -0500
- I'd like one of those 4.2's you are pulling out. I'll swap you a 3.9 (I have 2). Anybody close enough to virginia to make it worthwhile? The probably aren't all that much to ship as they are small...
- /html/spridgets/1999-01/msg00006.html (8,003 bytes)
- 3. Changing from 4.22 to 3.909 diff (score: 1)
- Author: Martyn Ridley <ridleymj@bis.on.ca>
- Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 09:03:03 -0500
- I would like to change the frog diff from 4.22 to 3.9 to get a little extra highway speed. The car has a ribcase gearbox but or what vintage I can't say. Have any of you done this? What all must I ch
- /html/spridgets/1998-12/msg00854.html (7,829 bytes)
- 4. Re: Changing from 4.22 to 3.909 diff (score: 1)
- Author: "Peter Samaroo" <mrbugeye@hotmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 07:16:46 PST
- I did this a while back on my Bugeye, On my car the speedo is actually more accurate with the 3.9 than it was with the 4.22. By my calculation the change resulted in a 7 percent reduction in speedo
- /html/spridgets/1998-12/msg00857.html (9,266 bytes)
- 5. Re: Changing from 4.22 to 3.909 diff (score: 1)
- Author: GMari58175@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 10:39:51 EST
- << PS: Has anybody seen the 'continental' speedo for a frog. I was thinking of 'metrifing' the olde girl while making the diff conversion. Martyn, If your looking for a KPH speedo for the bugeye, I h
- /html/spridgets/1998-12/msg00861.html (7,444 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu