Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Chevy\s+\/\s+Ford\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Chevy\s+\/\s+Ford\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Chevy / Ford (score: 1): Author: Dick J <lsr_man@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2000 06:13:42 -0800 (PST); I always thought the biggest problem for Fords was small head passages. Chevys flow better than Fords. Not SO??? Why would Ford heads on a Chevy be good? I would think Chevy heads on a Ford would be; /html/land-speed/2000-02/msg00186.html (6,977 bytes)
2. Re: Chevy / Ford (score: 1): Author: V4GR@aol.com; Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2000 11:44:59 EST; List; These are the "Boss 351" Cleveland heads that have very large intakes and somewhat restricted exhaust ports. The fix is to mill off about half an inch or so from the exhaust port side of the he; /html/land-speed/2000-02/msg00191.html (7,033 bytes)
3. Re: Chevy / Ford (score: 1): Author: George Mitchell <americanpartner@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2000 06:25:18 -0800 (PST); /html/land-speed/2000-02/msg00200.html (7,159 bytes)
4. Re: Chevy / Ford (score: 1): Author: "Chris R Harris" <yesford@clear.net.nz>; Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 09:55:27 +1300; Now you've got me going Dick. Ford heads have small ports huh ! I owned a 69 Ford 'Boss' 302, it had inlets of 2.225" and exhausts of 1.71" stock. The dammed ports were that big that for TransAm raci; /html/land-speed/2000-02/msg00204.html (8,089 bytes)
5. Re: Chevy / Ford (score: 1): Author: Dick J <lsr_man@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2000 13:26:35 -0800 (PST); Hmmmm. I dunno. I'm neither a Ford nor a Chevy guy, I just thought that's what I had read down through the years. I'm learning stuff now though! == ............................. ..........Dick J.....; /html/land-speed/2000-02/msg00207.html (7,479 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]