Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Cingular\s+Wireless\s+\-\s+OT\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Cingular\s+Wireless\s+\-\s+OT\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. Cingular Wireless - OT (score: 1): Author: "James Nazarian" <jhn3@uakron.edu>; Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 22:26:57 -0500; I just got word that AT&T will be selling its wireless division, sounds like it will be to Cingular. Does anyone have any experience, good or bad, with their GSM network. I'm especially interested in; /html/mgs/2004-01/msg00296.html (7,713 bytes)
2. Re: Cingular Wireless - OT (score: 1): Author: Carl French <leylandauto@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 19:56:26 -0800 (PST); My guess is that they are selling the entire shebang, with thier coverage areas and such. Cingulair does not operate in Northern New England but ATT is big and reliable here (GSM is just catching on; /html/mgs/2004-01/msg00297.html (8,711 bytes)
3. RE: Cingular Wireless - OT (score: 1): Author: "Matthew E. Hale" <haleme@bellsouth.net>; Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 22:54:03 -0500; I have Cingular and really like it. The GSM network will really worth the wait in my opinion. I am getting a Quad band phone next week that will be worldwide, excellent because I do a little travelin; /html/mgs/2004-01/msg00298.html (8,255 bytes)
4. Re: Cingular Wireless - OT (score: 1): Author: LBCarCoMail@aol.com; Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 23:15:15 EST; I have been with T-Mobile for about two years now and on GSM system first in the UK and France and then here with TMobile. The system is great and far better than Cingular/AT T. I have only had two; /html/mgs/2004-01/msg00299.html (8,392 bytes)
5. Re: Cingular Wireless - OT (score: 1): Author: ATWEDITOR@aol.com; Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 08:44:29 EST; In a message dated 1/22/2004 11:16:36 PM Eastern Standard Time, LBCarCoMail@aol.com writes: The system is great and far better than Cingular/AT T. I have only had two places I have not gotten it to w; /html/mgs/2004-01/msg00306.html (8,056 bytes)
6. RE: Cingular Wireless - OT (score: 1): Author: David Councill <dcouncil@imt.net>; Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 09:14:42 -0700; Unfortunately, I'm not too "hip" on what GSM is. I currently use Verizon (tri-mode) because I need a US nationwide plan, no roaming, so I can maintain contact during most of my travels. However, I ma; /html/mgs/2004-01/msg00308.html (9,241 bytes)
7. Re: Cingular Wireless - OT (score: 1): Author: LBCarCoMail@aol.com; Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 12:21:45 EST; If you find you need a phone to use in the UK the best option I have found is Virgin. You an go into any Virgin Megastore and buy a triband phone pretty inexpensively and their service is very low c; /html/mgs/2004-01/msg00309.html (9,763 bytes)
8. Re: Cingular Wireless - OT (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>; Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 09:27:14 -0800; It makes me wonder sometimes... do you see a cell tower every 14 miles when driving to the Grand Canyon? Or in NW North Dakota? They aren't satellite phones... good grief. Damn good thing there ARE d; /html/mgs/2004-01/msg00311.html (9,220 bytes)
9. Re: Cingular Wireless - OT (score: 1): Author: Paul Root <proot@iaces.com>; Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 12:00:51 -0600; I went through the Bad Lands this past summer. What a wonderful site. One cell phone tower would ruin it for me. We have a cell phone for dialing out. I cherish being 'out of communication'! :-) -- _; /html/mgs/2004-01/msg00312.html (9,892 bytes)
10. Re: Cingular Wireless - OT (score: 1): Author: "Scott & Lynn Hower" <howersl@att.net>; Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 20:15:45 -0500; I have ATT Wireless GSM service; no coverage problems in the NYC to Philadelphia metro area. As others have suggested, save your money on tri/quad band phones. The ATT charges for GSM service in Eur; /html/mgs/2004-01/msg00325.html (8,406 bytes)
11. Re: Cingular Wireless - OT (score: 1): Author: "James Nazarian" <jhn3@uakron.edu>; Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 13:15:11 -0500; Hey guys, I seem to be hearing good things about cingular and verizon, but there have been some questions about GSM and TDMA. Basically GSM is the European standard for cellular and is the system tha; /html/mgs/2004-01/msg00327.html (11,078 bytes)
12. Re: Cingular Wireless - OT (score: 1): Author: Bullwinkle <yd3@nvc.net>; Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 17:07:58 -0600; I can relate to that when I travel from Aberdeen, SD to my brother's in Belle Fouche via Mobridge, Izabelle, Eagle Butte and Wall. <<<snip>>>> And dead spots - here in the west, we have some pretty; /html/mgs/2004-01/msg00330.html (8,476 bytes)
13. RE: Cingular Wireless - OT (score: 1): Author: "Larry list account" <list@marketvalue.net>; Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 20:22:36 -0700; James, I believe Verizon (which I use) is CDMA not TDMA. I've had various carriers over the last 20 years, Verizon is best. I presently have 3 tri-mode phones which works about everywhere, I travel r; /html/mgs/2004-01/msg00334.html (11,582 bytes)
14. Re: Cingular Wireless - OT (score: 1): Author: "Chuck Renner" <crenner@dynalivery.com>; Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 22:14:39 -0600; is Uh, there's also CDMA here in the U.S.; /html/mgs/2004-01/msg00337.html (8,314 bytes)
15. RE: Cingular Wireless - OT (score: 1): Author: "Ronald Olds" <tr6@pipeline.com>; Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 08:00:30 -0600; The most important feature of a phone if you want to have full coverage is to be able to work on analog as well as digital. There are many areas of the country where there is no digital and even more; /html/mgs/2004-01/msg00342.html (10,016 bytes)
16. Re: Cingular Wireless - OT (score: 1): Author: Bill McLeod <wbmcleod@cox.net>; Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 07:39:55 -0700; I, too have ATT, but have switched to GSM, and have no regrets (except for signing a 2 year agreement with a company that is about to be sold). The GSM coverage is, for now, useable only in the more; /html/mgs/2004-01/msg00344.html (8,964 bytes)
17. RE: Cingular Wireless - OT (score: 1): Author: "Ronald Olds" <tr6@pipeline.com>; Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 10:39:08 -0600; There are still a lot of analog systems out there. This week I was working around Las Cruces, NM and out in the desert and all I had was an analog signal. I realize GSM will be the future and digital; /html/mgs/2004-01/msg00346.html (8,852 bytes)
18. Re: Cingular Wireless - OT (score: 1): Author: MGBnutt@aol.com; Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 13:03:56 EST; Oh...how I do miss my old analog AT&T phone! I reluctantly made the switch to a (dual-mode) Verizon phone a few years ago. Guess now I'll be switching to GSM soon! Ah, technology marches on... As a s; /html/mgs/2004-01/msg00349.html (8,044 bytes)
19. Re: Cingular Wireless - OT (score: 1): Author: MGBnutt@aol.com; Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 13:07:49 EST; Remember, it doesn't matter what service you have: No cell towers = No cell service donny v 1978 MGB <<<snip>>>> And dead spots - here in the west, we have some pretty remote areas where I have no si; /html/mgs/2004-01/msg00350.html (7,827 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 19
Page: [1]