- 1. Competition Manuals vs. Triumph Book (score: 1)
- Author: EISANDIEGO@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 12:13:35 EST
- As a practical matter, it would seem better to have the competition manuals as a online document that could be continuously and easily updated than to create another printed book. It would be great i
- /html/fot/2002-11/msg00278.html (7,172 bytes)
- 2. Re: Competition Manuals vs. Triumph Book (score: 1)
- Author: "michael cook" <mlcooknj@msn.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 14:25:52 -0500
- The problem with putting anything on-line is that you first have to make a couple of decisions: 1. Do you care about your copyright or do you want everyone and anyone worldwide to have free access to
- /html/fot/2002-11/msg00283.html (7,904 bytes)
- 3. Re: Competition Manuals vs. Triumph Book (score: 1)
- Author: EISANDIEGO@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 15:53:11 EST
- For the reasons that you have pointed out, putting a manuscript on the history of Triumph racing online is probably not the best strategy. If I implied that, I certainly did not mean to do so. Howev
- /html/fot/2002-11/msg00284.html (7,312 bytes)
- 4. Re: Competition Manuals vs. Triumph Book (score: 1)
- Author: "John Wilkins" <john@race-dogs.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 13:05:01 -0800
- Not that I leaning either way with online documentation, but controlling it can be done very easily on the web! Copyright,accuracy is a whole other issue. If and when it ever happened can be controll
- /html/fot/2002-11/msg00286.html (8,921 bytes)
- 5. RE: Competition Manuals vs. Triumph Book (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 13:49:08 -0800
- Actually it's not that simple, but it is doable. When you make an electronic version of any document available you subject it to the potential for copying in any of myriad ways. You do in paper form
- /html/fot/2002-11/msg00288.html (10,684 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu