Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Complete\s+ProSolo\s+points\.\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Complete\s+ProSolo\s+points\.\.\.\.\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. Complete ProSolo points.... (score: 1): Author: Mike King <mapcomaps@attbi.com>; Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 11:44:41 -0400; Just wondering, but why isn't there a complete listing of competitors with their points totals listed on the SCCA website? I see a few people here and there who have run this year, most likely the on; /html/autox/2003-05/msg00086.html (8,448 bytes)
2. Re: Complete ProSolo points.... (score: 1): Author: "Patrick Washburn" <washburn@dwave.net>; Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 12:16:51 -0500; Hey, if you allow non-license holders to sign up for the Finale ahead of the O.K., here's a reciprocal question: If I have not run a Pro yet, but am registered for 2 Pro's plus the Finale, should I h; /html/autox/2003-05/msg00089.html (8,233 bytes)
3. Re: Complete ProSolo points.... (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Winchell" <Jeff@Winchell.Org>; Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 11:50:28 -0700; I don't know the reason why, but you can get a complete listing of competitors and their current points on the prosolo season forecast at http://PonyCar.Net. /// unsubscribe/change address requests; /html/autox/2003-05/msg00090.html (8,289 bytes)
4. Re: Complete ProSolo points.... (score: 1): Author: Mike King <mapcomaps@attbi.com>; Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 16:36:12 -0400; Actuall its almost complete..but still missing alot of drivers...I'm looking for a complete listing of all competitors in all classes this year. Something tells me it doesn't exist in total form. Mik; /html/autox/2003-05/msg00092.html (8,221 bytes)
5. Re: Complete ProSolo points.... (score: 1): Author: "Rick Brown" <free2000@quixnet.net>; Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 13:36:32 -0700; .......well, as long as entry fees and travel are not an issue........because it's a fun format to drive; because there is contingency money available; because it's another chance for seat time; bec; /html/autox/2003-05/msg00093.html (8,608 bytes)
6. Re: Complete ProSolo points.... (score: 1): Author: Mike King <mapcomaps@attbi.com>; Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 16:37:53 -0400; Why have a license at all? I don't want to go there actually...I think that ones already been hashed out. MK /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.; /html/autox/2003-05/msg00094.html (8,854 bytes)
7. Re: Complete ProSolo points.... (score: 1): Author: Mike King <mapcomaps@attbi.com>; Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 16:43:30 -0400; 800 miles is my closest ProSolo except for Ft Myers which was 300. Seat time isn't a problem...plenty of that around here. I'm just thinking something needs to be done to control who qualifies for th; /html/autox/2003-05/msg00095.html (9,391 bytes)
8. Re: Complete ProSolo points.... (score: 1): Author: "Patrick Washburn" <washburn@dwave.net>; Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 17:12:50 -0500; My point wasn't to criticize the license requirement. You implied the allowing of non-license holders to sign up for the Finale ahead of license holders was wrong. I gave you an example of why me, a; /html/autox/2003-05/msg00096.html (9,568 bytes)
9. Re: Complete ProSolo points.... (score: 1): Author: "Patrick Washburn" <washburn@dwave.net>; Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 10:21:33 -0500; I think it's possible, and makes sense. Obviously, many people will be "on the bubble" until all the Pro's are completed and the entry list made out, so knowing who is in and who is out is something; /html/autox/2003-05/msg00106.html (9,207 bytes)
10. Re: Complete ProSolo points.... (score: 1): Author: "Charles" <golden1@britsys.net>; Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 12:20:33 -0400; The problem is that the Finale is a complete event by itself, with trophies, prizes and contingencies based on just that event as well as counting towards championships. To exclude anyone who is othe; /html/autox/2003-05/msg00109.html (11,068 bytes)
11. Re: Complete ProSolo points.... (score: 1): Author: "Charles" <golden1@britsys.net>; Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 12:52:40 -0400; I meant to add that in my scenario, their actual finish in the Championship event would determine the national champions, not their (qualifying) points earned at other events. trophies, them the qual; /html/autox/2003-05/msg00110.html (11,891 bytes)
12. Re: Complete ProSolo points.... (score: 1): Author: Randy Chase <randyc2@cox.net>; Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 10:03:39 -0700; Not exactly, because the Finale is already excluding anyone that has not done two events in that class. Other than that, yes it is an event by itself, but it seems that SCCA's requirement of the two; /html/autox/2003-05/msg00111.html (11,135 bytes)
13. Re: Complete ProSolo points.... (score: 1): Author: Randy Chase <randyc2@cox.net>; Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 11:23:42 -0700; I want to go on record as being very opposed to that idea. One of the main reasons I like the ProSolo format is that it is series based and rewards good and consistent driving during the season combi; /html/autox/2003-05/msg00114.html (9,637 bytes)
14. Re: Complete ProSolo points.... (score: 1): Author: "Charles" <golden1@britsys.net>; Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 15:56:30 -0400; Randy, that's the scenario that is more problematic than solved by the point system as it now stands IMHO. Take this year's GS class for example. It is a HIGHLY contested class here in the SE, 5 of t; /html/autox/2003-05/msg00118.html (11,230 bytes)
15. Re: Complete ProSolo points.... (score: 1): Author: Randy Chase <randyc2@cox.net>; Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 14:57:08 -0700; Geography is part of racing. Everyone is free to travel out of their region, and many top competitors will indeed cross the country to get what they think are easy points or a better shot at it anyho; /html/autox/2003-05/msg00122.html (12,465 bytes)
16. Re: Complete ProSolo points.... (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Winchell" <Jeff@Winchell.Org>; Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 15:53:35 -0700; With 3 or more championship caliber drivers in the same region, it's quite conceivable one of them will never get a win in their part of the country and therefore not have a shot at winning the over; /html/autox/2003-05/msg00129.html (10,511 bytes)
17. Re: Complete ProSolo points.... (score: 1): Author: Scott Troyer - TestEng DDR TMR <stroyer@micron.com>; Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 17:25:28 -0600; Charles, I see your point but I think you are placing a little too much emphasis on the Pax results. It can vary dramatically depending upon the course, where Fontana and Atwater are perfect examples; /html/autox/2003-05/msg00132.html (10,336 bytes)
18. Re: Complete ProSolo points.... (score: 1): Author: "Charles" <golden1@britsys.net>; Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 19:46:44 -0400; actually my proposal was modeled on the way circle track races are run when there are a lot more entries than can be accommidated in one race, i.e. sprint cars, modifieds, etc. They hold qualifying h; /html/autox/2003-05/msg00133.html (11,999 bytes)
19. Re: Complete ProSolo points.... (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Winchell" <Jeff@Winchell.Org>; Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 17:13:19 -0700; This is only a minor point in the larger issue, but FWIW, I did a modified ProSolo index for Fontana because the course so favored narrower, lower HP cars. Joe Goeke still did pretty well, coming out; /html/autox/2003-05/msg00134.html (10,264 bytes)
20. Re: Complete ProSolo points.... (score: 1): Author: "Charles" <golden1@britsys.net>; Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 20:29:13 -0400; I used the pax as the only method of comparison available to show my point. I realize that the pax position is course, weather etc. dependent but without head to head results to use, I made the theor; /html/autox/2003-05/msg00136.html (11,136 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]