- 1. Concours and Undercoating (score: 1)
- Author: Editorgary@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 17:45:52 EDT
- To give you an idea of how seriously Concours resists undercoating: the policy is that every part with undercoating that prevents getting an idea of its condition and correctness is scored as zero fo
- /html/healeys/2004-08/msg00373.html (7,653 bytes)
- 2. Re: Concours and Undercoating (score: 1)
- Author: John Miller <healeys@n4vu.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 18:39:11 -0400
- So (and please understand, I'm not arguing, just "what-if-ing" you) if I bought a brand new Healey in the '60s, with dealer-installed undercoating, and put it in air-conditioned storage for 40 years
- /html/healeys/2004-08/msg00376.html (7,898 bytes)
- 3. Re: Concours and Undercoating (score: 1)
- Author: "davidwjones" <davidwjones@cox.net>
- Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 20:05:20 -0400
- bought a brand new Healey in the '60s, with dealer-installed undercoating, and put it in air-conditioned storage for 40 years before taking it to a concours event for judging, it'd get points deduct
- /html/healeys/2004-08/msg00381.html (7,670 bytes)
- 4. Re: Concours and Undercoating (score: 1)
- Author: "Dallas Congleton" <dcong996@earthlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 21:26:46 -0400
- Actually undercoating was the most COMMONLY installed dealer option because it was a huge profit item. The price was $300 for approximately $3.00 worth of product. This $300 was already added the inv
- /html/healeys/2004-08/msg00385.html (8,579 bytes)
- 5. Re: Concours and Undercoating (score: 1)
- Author: Roland Wilhelmy <rwil@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 20:06:23 -0700
- My new 1956 BN2 came to me without undercoating (but with mirrors on the fenders/wings because I asked for them) and the dealer didn't ask me or urge me to take any undercoating. Dealer: Peter Satori
- /html/healeys/2004-08/msg00388.html (7,834 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu