Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Cylynder\s+bore\s+damage\s+$and\s+repair\s+\?\?$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Cylynder\s+bore\s+damage\s+$and\s+repair\s+\?\?$\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Cylynder bore damage (and repair ??) (score: 1): Author: Cliff Maddox <maddox@pacbell.net>; Date: Mon, 13 Jan 1997 00:13:45 -0800; Hello (and help) Does anyone have any experiences relating to repairing a damages 1800cc block by sleeving??? I have a very recently rebuilt engine from my '65 which choked on a broken ring shortly i; /html/mgs/1997-01/msg00688.html (8,304 bytes)
2. RE: Cylynder bore damage (and repair ??) (score: 1): Author: <larry.g.unger@lmco.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Jan 1997 10:22:16 -0500; Nope ... but that won't stop me from responding ... 'cause I'm sure that others on the list will correct any erroneous info. <g>. The block is overbored to accept the sleeve ... once the sleeve is i; /html/mgs/1997-01/msg00701.html (9,088 bytes)
3. Re: Cylynder bore damage (and repair ??) (score: 1): Author: "Vince J. Pujalte" <pujalte@stic.net>; Date: Mon, 13 Jan 1997 15:34:36 -0800; Shouldn't ALL the cylinders be re-sleeved to avoid disparities in Brake Mean Effective Pressure? (I have been reading the Technical posts). I would think that having varying cylinder swept-volumes w; /html/mgs/1997-01/msg00716.html (7,820 bytes)
4. Re: Cylynder bore damage (and repair ??) (score: 1): Author: "Vince J. Pujalte" <pujalte@stic.net>; Date: Mon, 13 Jan 1997 17:25:13 -0800; I seem to have misunderstood. I was thinking that you would have the newly-sleeved cylinder at standard dimension and the unsleeved cylinders at an over-size dimension. Jarl tactfully pointed this m; /html/mgs/1997-01/msg00718.html (7,800 bytes)
5. RE: Cylynder bore damage (and repair ??) (score: 1): Author: <larry.g.unger@lmco.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Jan 1997 16:25:19 -0500; Hmmm ... not sure I follow you ... don't recall stating anything that would indicate that you should ever have a variance in swept-volume between cylinders. Sleeves can be overbored up to +.040 ...; /html/mgs/1997-01/msg00722.html (8,556 bytes)
6. Re: Cylynder bore damage (and repair ??) (score: 1): Author: barneymg@juno.com (Barney Gaylord); Date: Mon, 13 Jan 1997 17:29:08 EST; On Mon, 13 Jan 1997 00:13:45 -0800 Cliff Maddox <maddox@pacbell.net> had fairly Cliff, I had exactly this problem with my 1500 about five years ago. It was a fairly fresh engine, .030" overbore, brok; /html/mgs/1997-01/msg00724.html (9,106 bytes)
7. Re: Cylynder bore damage (and repair ??) (score: 1): Author: "A. B. Bonds" <ab@vuse.vanderbilt.edu>; Date: 13 Jan 1997 17:00:14 -0600; The sleeves are the same inside diameter as specified originally. A. B. Bonds; /html/mgs/1997-01/msg00730.html (7,937 bytes)
8. Re: Cylynder bore damage (and repair ??) (score: 1): Author: Keith <klh24@csufresno.edu>; Date: Tue, 14 Jan 97 10:05:33 -0000; I had a 1800 that was badly rusted and needed to be bored .060 over I was told that the motor would run hot with this large a bore. and found another block. I know brit-tech or someone sells a race e; /html/mgs/1997-01/msg00770.html (7,823 bytes)
9. Re: Cylynder bore damage (and repair ??) (score: 1): Author: GOFASTMG@aol.com; Date: Tue, 14 Jan 1997 14:20:40 -0500 (EST); In answer to your question, will a .060" over bore make your 1800 run hot, the answer is "Maybe" The variable is the wall thickness of a particular block. If a block (any block) is bored too much, t; /html/mgs/1997-01/msg00787.html (8,553 bytes)
10. Re: Cylynder bore damage (and repair ??) (score: 1): Author: britcars@juno.com; Date: Tue, 14 Jan 1997 15:55:41 EST; My own BGT and several of my customers' Bs are running .060" over with no problems whatsoever. Even on 100 degree-plus days, my car never gets much over mid-way on the temp gauge. Lawrie British Spor; /html/mgs/1997-01/msg00794.html (7,889 bytes)
11. RE: Cylynder bore damage (and repair ??) (score: 1): Author: <larry.g.unger@lmco.com>; Date: Tue, 14 Jan 1997 21:46:39 -0500; Following are approximate ... IOW, within a cc or two. +.020 1822cc +.030 1833cc +.040 1845cc +.060 1868cc +.080 1892cc +.130 1950cc <-- 18V w/ sonic testing to insure adequate cylinder wall thicknes; /html/mgs/1997-01/msg00816.html (9,760 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]