Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*DCOE\s+Carbs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*DCOE\s+Carbs\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. DCOE Carbs (score: 1): Author: "J. Michael Roach" <mroach@sockets.net>; Date: Fri, 19 Jul 1996 14:47:40 -0500; I need some help with my '75 Midget. I have the stock ZenStrom right = now, but the idle is about 2000 rpm, and I can't get it down. I'm assuming that the carb has developed leaks, and needs to be =; /html/mgs/1996-07/msg00628.html (7,318 bytes)
2. RE: DCOE Carbs (score: 1): Author: "J. Michael Roach" <mroach@sockets.net>; Date: Fri, 19 Jul 1996 15:24:07 -0500; That's what I thought. Since my first question was stupid (as I suspected it would be!), let me ask: - Will the downdraft carb fit under the hood on the 1500cc Spit engine that came in the 1975 Midge; /html/mgs/1996-07/msg00629.html (7,751 bytes)
3. Re: DCOE Carbs (score: 1): Author: Jeremy DuBois <jer@thlogic.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Jul 1996 20:39:25 -0400 (EDT); I just put a Weber 32/36 DGV on my Spitfire 1500 (I know, I know, the T word) without any other modifications, and it works just great. I'm quite happy with it. Acceleration is quite noticably bette; /html/mgs/1996-07/msg00640.html (8,179 bytes)
4. RE: DCOE Carbs (score: 1): Author: Bill Lattimer <m22@skypoint.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Jul 1996 11:16:23 -0500 (CDT); I don't know that I completely agree with this, since no sizes are mentioned. With a 40 DCOE and the proper size chokes, a sidedraft can be a very streetable, responsive carb from off-idle to the to; /html/mgs/1996-07/msg00706.html (7,755 bytes)
5. RE: DCOE Carbs (score: 1): Author: "J. Michael Roach" <mroach@sockets.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Jul 1996 11:23:29 -0500; Good points. In this case, the DGV I'm looking at is the 32mm/36mm progressive = downdraft. I'm not looking to race, but i *am* looking to make *a lot* = of noise! This car (1975 Midget [1500cc Spitf; /html/mgs/1996-07/msg00736.html (8,389 bytes)
6. DCOE Carbs (score: 1): Author: midget@megumi.system.nitech.ac.jp (Kazuya Horibe); Date: Tue, 23 Jul 96 11:53:51 JST; Hello,Bill. I agree up to a point. If the carb setting is good,it is very responsive and more powerfull than ZS or SU (at least I feel so). I love the weber carb. It's great. But there are other cons; /html/mgs/1996-07/msg00737.html (9,402 bytes)
7. RE: DCOE Carbs (score: 1): Author: Bill Lattimer <m22@skypoint.com>; Date: Sat, 27 Jul 1996 20:54:02 -0500; If the carb setting is good,it is very responsive and more powerfull than ZS or SU (at least I feel so). Hence the need for dyno tuning I feel I should mention that the engine vibration increase and; /html/mgs/1996-07/msg00939.html (7,906 bytes)
8. RE: DCOE Carbs (score: 1): Author: "J. Michael Roach" <mroach@sockets.net>; Date: Mon, 29 Jul 1996 09:26:52 -0500; I think I've decided the best choice is the progressive downdraft (32/36 = DGV Weber). Although I've received mixed reports from the list, most = people concur the DCOE will work, but trying to keep; /html/mgs/1996-07/msg00974.html (8,956 bytes)
9. RE: DCOE Carbs (score: 1): Author: Bill Lattimer <m22@skypoint.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Jul 1996 09:39:39 -0500; Ah! So YOU'RE the one that started this! :-) You've certainly made a well-informed decision! I suggest the TWM intake manifold for this, although it'll probably be easier to install one of the prefab; /html/mgs/1996-07/msg01064.html (9,400 bytes)
10. RE: DCOE Carbs (score: 1): Author: "J. Michael Roach" <mroach@sockets.net>; Date: Wed, 31 Jul 1996 11:09:37 -0500; I sure will. Ah! So YOU'RE the one that started this! :-) You've certainly made a well-informed decision! I suggest the TWM intake manifold for this, although it'll probably be easier to install one; /html/mgs/1996-07/msg01107.html (9,581 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]