Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*DM\s+\&\s+EM\s+minimum\s+weights\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*DM\s+\&\s+EM\s+minimum\s+weights\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. RE: DM & EM minimum weights (score: 1): Author: "K.C. Babb" <kcb4286@hps13.iasl.ca.boeing.com>; Date: Mon, 8 Feb 1999 09:32:13 -0800 (PST); Bill Schmidt (I think) said, without any line breaks: Me: "If you build it, they will come" has long been an argument posed by those who would like a class "made over" to provide more competitiveness; /html/autox/1999-02/msg00351.html (12,295 bytes)
2. Re: DM & EM minimum weights (score: 1): Author: Keith Wheeler <keithw@sand.net>; Date: Mon, 08 Feb 1999 23:01:57 -0800; Agreed. To a point. I'll admit, I've got a bit of the "I class." It'd be a blast to have a class where my project, a street driven MGB powered by a 3.9 litre Rover V-8, could really be competitive. A; /html/autox/1999-02/msg00419.html (8,206 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]