Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Dif\s+for\s+racing\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Dif\s+for\s+racing\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. RE: Dif for racing (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 06:35:37 +1000; John Deikis - Couldn't agree more. Can't agree with John Carey though. I've only ever broken 1 diff in racing and that diff was suspect *and* we use standing starts (5000rpm, drop the clutch and laun; /html/spridgets/2002-09/msg00017.html (8,058 bytes)
2. Re: Dif for racing (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 20:29:45 EDT; Last I heard, you don't use LSD. (which is very questionable). If you do, all I'm saying is that you get a much better diff with disk brakes using the RX7 diff. for a LOT less money than any single; /html/spridgets/2002-09/msg00028.html (6,914 bytes)
3. RE: Dif for racing (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 20:53:21 +1000; Never found the need. If you set the car up well (stiff (esp. at the front), plenty of suspension droop at the rear, no rear sway bar), and use an appropriate driving style ( a) don't brake too late; /html/spridgets/2002-09/msg00046.html (9,285 bytes)
4. Dif for racing (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 17:41:27 -0400; Okay, Spridget racers-- here's a $0.02 opportunity for you. Generally, the 3.9 diff is considered too high for Spridgets at most tracks. Seems a lot of folks run the 4.22. Crunching numbers, It looks; /html/spridgets/2002-08/msg00575.html (6,969 bytes)
5. Re: Dif for racing (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 18:57:50 EDT; Racing Spridget Diff. is an Oxymoron. Race they might, but not for long. The RX7 diff conversion is 4:10, works great, has hardened axels, LSD, AND rear disk brakes. John Carey Bugeye Gallery, diffs,; /html/spridgets/2002-08/msg00579.html (6,876 bytes)
6. Fw: Dif for racing (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 01:09:19 -0400; IMHO I think it would be the same as running a 4.11 rear from a Hudson Kent Anybody have an opinion on running a 4.11 rear (originally fitted to the Nash Metropolitan)? /// unsubscribe/change address; /html/spridgets/2002-08/msg00590.html (6,880 bytes)
7. RE: Dif for racing (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 09:40:46 -0500; ...'course, another way to look at it is that this logic can apply to most mechanical components of old Brit racers. And the conclusion would be, why not just race the RX7 rear end....with the Rx7 at; /html/spridgets/2002-08/msg00688.html (7,747 bytes)
8. RE: Dif for racing (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 10:52:00 -0500; [Deikis, John] Right! Don't matter to me. Car came out of the showroom with the 3.9 so I run a 3.9. But on short tracks, it's too high. Your comments about tire diameters remind me that my question; /html/spridgets/2002-08/msg00694.html (10,422 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]