- 1. Early MGB diff ratios (score: 1)
- Author: "Larry Hoy" <larryhoy@prodigy.net>
- Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2000 15:17:17 -0600
- I have sent this message several times but it doesn't seem to make it to the list. I had been un-subscribed over the holiday, and now that I have re-subscribed I think the list server isn't recognizi
- /html/mgs/2000-07/msg00326.html (8,385 bytes)
- 2. Re: Early MGB diff ratios (score: 1)
- Author: "Kai M. Radicke" <kai@radiohead.net>
- Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2000 21:25:14 -0400
- Hi Larry, I've got a short list of some ratios available for the Salisbury type rear axle. Part # Ratio BTB653 3.909:1 88G283 4.3:1 88G284 4.55:1 ATB7056 4.875:1 Perhaps there are more, I believe Bro
- /html/mgs/2000-07/msg00336.html (7,644 bytes)
- 3. Re: Early MGB diff ratios (score: 1)
- Author: Barney Gaylord <barneymg@ntsource.com>
- Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2000 20:41:06 -0500
- axle. Add these: 4.100:1 from the MGA 1600 MK-II 5.xxx:1 from MG TD/TF models (more than one ratio) Barney Gaylord 1958 MGA with an attitude http://www.ntsource.com/~barneymg
- /html/mgs/2000-07/msg00338.html (8,020 bytes)
- 4. RE: Early MGB diff ratios (score: 1)
- Author: "Larry Hoy" <larryhoy@prodigy.net>
- Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2000 20:16:20 -0600
- So the MGA gears fit the early B? The whole carrier or just the gears? Larry Hoy
- /html/mgs/2000-07/msg00339.html (8,830 bytes)
- 5. Re: Early MGB diff ratios (score: 1)
- Author: "Lawrie Alexander" <Lawrie@britcars.com>
- Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2000 19:25:58 -0700
- I do know that the MGA gearsets will fit in an early B, "banjo" style casing. I do know that the axle called a Salisbury is the later style, where the gears are accessed through a plate on the back
- /html/mgs/2000-07/msg00340.html (9,901 bytes)
- 6. Re: Early MGB diff ratios (score: 1)
- Author: Barney Gaylord <barneymg@ntsource.com>
- Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2000 22:20:10 -0500
- gears are accessed through a plate on the back of the axle housing. for a Salisbury axle. Certainly, several ratios were available for the early, "banjo" axle, in the ratios that Kai mentions. For th
- /html/mgs/2000-07/msg00343.html (8,990 bytes)
- 7. RE: Early MGB diff ratios (score: 1)
- Author: "Larry Hoy" <larryhoy@prodigy.net>
- Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2000 21:52:32 -0600
- Hehehe, well I am. I guess I may have started the confusion. I was incorrect when I included the Salisbury axle in my request. Here's what I think might be [close] to right???? Tube axles: 3.9 MGB f
- /html/mgs/2000-07/msg00345.html (11,584 bytes)
- 8. Re: Early MGB diff ratios (score: 1)
- Author: "Lawrie Alexander" <Lawrie@britcars.com>
- Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2000 21:24:29 -0700
- 4.55 was the MG Magnette ratio, also an optional MGA ratio. 4.875 was stock MG TF, 5.125 stock TD. The MGA and MGB gearsets can be re-machined to fit in a TD or TF axle housing, but I do not believe
- /html/mgs/2000-07/msg00346.html (12,829 bytes)
- 9. RE: Early MGB diff ratios (score: 1)
- Author: "Larry Hoy" <larryhoy@prodigy.net>
- Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2000 01:18:54 -0600
- Does this look complete? Banjo axles: 3.90 MGB 4.10 MGA 1600 MkII 4.30 MGA 4.55 MG Magnette 4.875 MG TF 5.13 MG TD Tube axles: 3.90 MGB 3.07 MGC 3.60 MGC There does seem to be some question as to whe
- /html/mgs/2000-07/msg00348.html (8,114 bytes)
- 10. Re: Early MGB diff ratios (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Schooler <schooler@erols.com>
- Date: Sun, 09 Jul 2000 07:17:13 -0400
- Guess I gotta chime in here...add to the Salisbury list (Tube type axle) a couple of ratios listed in my special tuning book (with competition part numbers): 4.22 (9/38) and 4.55(9/41). The MGB autom
- /html/mgs/2000-07/msg00354.html (8,783 bytes)
- 11. Re: Early MGB diff ratios (score: 1)
- Author: "Kai M. Radicke" <kai@radiohead.net>
- Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2000 08:29:44 -0400
- only Lawrie is (of course) correct. I was just using Larry's wording, without realizing his mistake. Kai
- /html/mgs/2000-07/msg00355.html (7,973 bytes)
- 12. RE: Early MGB diff ratios (score: 1)
- Author: "Larry Hoy" <larryhoy@prodigy.net>
- Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2000 09:54:56 -0600
- New Numbers have shown up. More input? Larry Hoy Does this look complete? Banjo axles: 3.90 MGB 11/43 4.10 MGA 1600 MkII 4.30 MGA 4.55 MG Magnette 4.875 MG TF 5.13 MG TD Tube axles: 3.90 MGB 11/43 3.
- /html/mgs/2000-07/msg00361.html (7,804 bytes)
- 13. Re: Early MGB diff ratios (score: 1)
- Author: Bud Krueger <bkrueger@ici.net>
- Date: Sun, 09 Jul 2000 13:13:22 -0400
- I believe that the MGA 4.30 set bolts directly into the TD. The only other pieces needed are the flange and the shims. I'll have to go and dig out Carl Cederstrand's treatise and check this out. I h
- /html/mgs/2000-07/msg00364.html (8,145 bytes)
- 14. Re: Early MGB diff ratios (score: 1)
- Author: "Larry Hoy" <larryhoy@prodigy.net>
- Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2000 22:21:25 -0600
- More new numbers. More input? Challenges? Does this look complete? Banjo axles: 3.90 MGB 11/43 4.10 MGA 1600 MkII 4.30 MGA 4.55 MG Magnette 4.875 MG TF 5.13 MG TD Tube axles: 3.07 MGC 3.31 MGC 3.60 M
- /html/mgs/2000-07/msg00384.html (7,842 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu