Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Engine\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Engine\s+question\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. Engine question (score: 1): Author: EDWARD BARNARD <edwardbarnard@prodigy.net>; Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 16:44:47 -0700 (PDT); Those of you who know me know that I've come up with some real hair brained ideas at times. Well this question may be another one of those way out ideas. Y'all be the judges. A couple of months ago; /html/fot/2004-08/msg00141.html (8,960 bytes)
2. RE: Engine question (score: 1): Author: "Randall Young" <ryoung@navcomtech.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 17:13:32 -0700; I'll let others talk about trying it with TRactor motors, but roller cams are a lot more than 20 years old. I can remember reading an article around 1975 about what happens when the lifter bores are; /html/fot/2004-08/msg00142.html (7,856 bytes)
3. Re: Engine question (score: 1): Author: "Scott Janzen" <s.janzen@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 19:58:32 -0400; I use an engine shop that does mostly big V-8s. Saw the same thing in a drag motor that was in there, with the tie bars between the lifters. Design of the motor was different in that the tops of the; /html/fot/2004-08/msg00143.html (9,675 bytes)
4. Re: Engine question (score: 1): Author: Tony Drews <tony@tonydrews.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 19:38:49 -0500; My '87 Mustang GT came from the factory with roller hydraulic lifters. My understanding is that the cam grind is significantly different on roller lifters, so there's some R & D that would need to be; /html/fot/2004-08/msg00144.html (8,516 bytes)
5. Re: Engine question (score: 1): Author: "kas kastner" <kaskas@cox.net>; Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 22:09:46 -0700; This stuff is so old , it was old when I was young and that wasn't yesterday by any means. I tried to homologate a roller cam with the SCCA in 1968 and of course they refused the idea. BUT, there was; /html/fot/2004-08/msg00145.html (9,666 bytes)
6. RE: Engine question (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 22:51:53 -0700; I built a 327 in 68 with a roller cam. They were really hot then. Lister's: Those of you who know me know that I've come up with some real hair brained ideas at times. Well this question may be anoth; /html/fot/2004-08/msg00146.html (9,377 bytes)
7. Re: Engine question (score: 1): Author: tom strange <tstrange@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 06:12:24 -0700 (PDT); Crazy.... no .... behind the times ,,, yes, a little.... STATEMENT ONE.... above all else... you will find this is HIGHLY illegal in most all organizations that run vintage stuff, unless the engine; /html/fot/2004-08/msg00147.html (11,042 bytes)
8. Re: Engine question (score: 1): Author: BillDentin@aol.com; Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 10:35:03 EDT; HOMOLOGATE? Is that that scandal in New Jersey? Bill (Damdinger); /html/fot/2004-08/msg00148.html (7,583 bytes)
9. RE: Engine question (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 08:02:26 -0700; Now that I think about it, it wasn't '68, the car was a 68, it was just after I got out of the Navy in 76 I built a 327 in 68 with a roller cam. They were really hot then. Lister's: Those of you who; /html/fot/2004-08/msg00149.html (9,688 bytes)
10. engine question (score: 1): Author: "riverside" <riverside@Cedar-Rapids.net>; Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 10:10:52 -0700; If memory serves me correctly, and it seldom does, the small block Mopar lifter is a larger dia. than the Ford/Chevy and rollers are readily available for it. art d; /html/fot/2004-08/msg00150.html (7,343 bytes)
11. Re: Engine question (score: 1): Author: Richard Good <goodparts@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 11:29:53 -0400; I started development of a roller cam kit over a year ago but have not had much time to work on it. I currently have a batch of steel cams at a macine shop getting the gear cut. I expect the price to; /html/fot/2004-08/msg00151.html (9,810 bytes)
12. Re: Engine question (score: 1): Author: Larry Young <cartravel@pobox.com>; Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 13:51:35 -0500; You can't tell much by looking at the cam lobe, because the geometry is completely different. For example, if you design a roller cam and a flat tappet cam that produce the same lift curve, they wil; /html/fot/2004-08/msg00152.html (7,704 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]