Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Engine\s+swap\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Engine\s+swap\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Engine swap (score: 1): Author: "Riesinger, James A. DOC" <James.Riesinger@doc.state.wi.us>; Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 10:25:31 -0600; Happy new year everyone. My goal for the new year is to get my 75 brick back on the road. Has anyone out there put a 350 Chevy in there brick? If so I would like to get in contact to discuss the prob; /html/bricklin/2005-01/msg00000.html (6,667 bytes)
2. RE: Engine swap (score: 1): Author: "Jim Pivirotto" <jpivirotto@firstindustrial.com>; Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 15:48:21 -0600; I don't have any info on the swap, but my question would be why? Pugs --Original Message-- From: owner-bricklin@autox.team.net [mailto:owner-bricklin@autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Riesinger, James A.; /html/bricklin/2005-01/msg00008.html (7,438 bytes)
3. Re: Engine swap (score: 1): Author: GLCurley@aol.com; Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 17:40:01 EST; As far as I know, that swap only been done with 1974 Bricklins, and possibly (I think) race cars. When you asked the question a couple years ago, George Schiro and Andrew Somerville were the people o; /html/bricklin/2005-01/msg00009.html (7,543 bytes)
4. RE: Engine swap (score: 1): Author: "George Schiro" <gschiro@localdialup.com>; Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:40:55 -0500; Why? Because it is a modern engine with electronic ignition and tuned port injection. It weighs about 100 lbs less that the AMC 360. It produces more horsepower and will give much better gas mileage.; /html/bricklin/2005-01/msg00010.html (9,161 bytes)
5. Re: Engine swap (score: 1): Author: GLCurley@aol.com; Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 23:57:52 EST; You have a 74, so it is a moot point. My question was why not just swap a modern Ford engine vs. switching manufacturers? TT told me the 74 chassis lent itself to a Chevrolet engine much easier than; /html/bricklin/2005-01/msg00011.html (10,588 bytes)
6. Re: Engine swap (score: 1): Author: "High Tech Coatings" <rick@hightechcoatings.com>; Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 05:12:47 -0500; Yes I can see dropping a chev engine to replace the AMC which has some parts issues, such as oil pump and distributor gears. BUT this is a 75, you can easily and cheaply do a small block ford to over; /html/bricklin/2005-01/msg00012.html (9,889 bytes)
7. Engine swap (score: 1): Author: "Riesinger, James A. DOC" <James.Riesinger@doc.state.wi.us>; Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 10:22:29 -0500; Has anyone installed a GM drive train in there Brick ? What kind of problems did you encounter ? /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mai; /html/bricklin/2002-10/msg00040.html (6,917 bytes)
8. RE: Engine swap (score: 1): Author: "George Schiro" <gschiro@lni.net>; Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 15:39:06 -0400; I'm in the process of installing a 305 TPI and a 700R4 from a 86 Camaro. No problems so far, but I'm really at the beginning. Current stage is sorting out the motor mounts and trans mount. Clearly a; /html/bricklin/2002-10/msg00042.html (7,561 bytes)
9. RE: Engine swap (score: 1): Author: "George Schiro" <gschiro@lni.net>; Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:04:25 -0400; Sure. I plan to keep the whole group updated. What setup are you thinking about? My Brick is a '74 and I have completely disassembled it so working in the engine compartment is fairly easy. If you go; /html/bricklin/2002-10/msg00049.html (8,612 bytes)
10. Re: Engine swap (score: 1): Author: Jason p Mcclure <jasonbrick@juno.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:03:48 -0700; You should go with the LT1 from a 92-96 Corvette. It has a distributor but it is located basically on the front of the crank and not the rear of the engine. It is a low profile engine and is shorter; /html/bricklin/2002-10/msg00052.html (7,091 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]