Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Failed\s+MA\s+inspection\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Failed\s+MA\s+inspection\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Failed MA inspection (score: 1): Author: "Michael W. Jose" <mwjose@cox.net>; Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 00:04:19 -0700; Haha, I see you've been to Arizona, if you mix that with brand new luxury SUVs swerving between them. Here we have emissions inspections, and this is the wild west, go figure. I've had fun every year; /html/mgs/2003-04/msg00000.html (7,573 bytes)
2. RE: Failed MA inspection (score: 1): Author: "Steve Shoyer" <Steve@shoyer.com>; Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 02:10:01 -0500; Sorry if my original note wasn't clear. I'm not complaining that my car failed inspection (disappointed, sure). I'm looking for help to understand what I need to fix. I had never seen this oil leak u; /html/mgs/2003-04/msg00001.html (8,457 bytes)
3. Re: Failed MA inspection (score: 1): Author: Paul Root <proot@iaces.com>; Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 07:13:59 -0600; I do have that set. Maybe because I have include as an attachment it's doing that to me. I'm using Mozilla 1.3. Strange. With most peoples mail, I don't have a problem. Of course, I did upgrade last; /html/mgs/2003-04/msg00005.html (8,112 bytes)
4. Re: Failed MA inspection (score: 1): Author: Paul Root <proot@iaces.com>; Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 07:20:04 -0600; There's no inspections in MN, either. And apparently, we up here like beuracracy. In fact, the only state that I lived in that did require them was Kansas. NY, CA, and IL didn't care. CA was just int; /html/mgs/2003-04/msg00006.html (8,002 bytes)
5. Re: Failed MA inspection (score: 1): Author: "David Breneman" <idcb@airborne.com>; Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 09:30:13 -0800 (PST); Charles & Peggy Robinson SEZ - You know, up until the 19th century, when humans began pumping oil out of the ground as a replacement for whale oil in lanterns, there were many places in the world whe; /html/mgs/2003-04/msg00013.html (8,347 bytes)
6. Re: Failed MA inspection (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@attbi.com>; Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 09:49:36 -0800; All you have to do is put 60-series tires on it... <g> -- Max Heim '66 MGB GHN3L76149 If you're near Mountain View, CA, it's the primer red one with chrome wires /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bi; /html/mgs/2003-04/msg00017.html (7,471 bytes)
7. Re: Failed MA inspection (score: 1): Author: "David Breneman" <idcb@airborne.com>; Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 10:27:06 -0800 (PST); Michael W. Jose SEZ - You're lucky that you have that option. Here in the People's Republic of Washington, one of the things they check is the idle speed. They put a little beanbag-like thing with an; /html/mgs/2003-04/msg00020.html (8,536 bytes)
8. RE: Failed MA inspection (score: 1): Author: Chuck Renner <crenner@dynalivery.com>; Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 12:42:16 -0600; However, there's usually a 'window' of acceptable idle speeds. If it's 500 RPM, bumping it up that much makes a significant difference in your exhaust gasses. /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/; /html/mgs/2003-04/msg00021.html (7,641 bytes)
9. Re: Failed MA inspection (score: 1): Author: "Michael W. Jose" <mwjose@cox.net>; Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 17:53:22 -0700; I think that 1500 is about as high as one can get away with here in AZ. They only do safety inspections on cars that have been totalled, as far as I know (they poke in the engine bay and you must mus; /html/mgs/2003-04/msg00040.html (8,116 bytes)
10. Failed MA inspection (score: 1): Author: "Steve Shoyer" <Steve@shoyer.com>; Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 12:25:54 -0500; I finally took my car to the inspection station, and I was dissappointed when it failed. In MA, the car (1980 MGB) is not required to pass emission inspection, just a safety check, which usually cons; /html/mgs/2003-03/msg00822.html (9,372 bytes)
11. Re: Failed MA inspection (score: 1): Author: Paul Root <proot@iaces.com>; Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 12:05:12 -0600; Could be your carbon canister is clogged? Is all the smog stuff there? You need ventilation on top and on the side cover. The side cover is the inlet and connects to the carb somewhere. The top is th; /html/mgs/2003-03/msg00825.html (12,231 bytes)
12. Re: Failed MA inspection (score: 1): Author: "RONALD OLDS" <tr6@pipeline.com>; Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 14:59:06 -0600; If they fail you for oil leaks there must not be many LBC's passing the MA when it failed. In MA, the car (1980 MGB) is not required to pass emission inspection, just a safety check, which usually co; /html/mgs/2003-03/msg00838.html (10,002 bytes)
13. RE: Failed MA inspection (score: 1): Author: "Steve Shoyer" <Steve@shoyer.com>; Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 16:17:24 -0500; To be fair to the guy, there was a decent amount of oil flowing onto their garage floor. He might not have noticed a few drips. Then again, when I tried to get out of it by loosening the oil filler c; /html/mgs/2003-03/msg00840.html (8,901 bytes)
14. Re: Failed MA inspection (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@attbi.com>; Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 13:53:24 -0800; Aargh -- a know-it-all. Hopefully you'll get a different inspector on the PS I'm glad they don't do inspections in CA. Think they'd flunk me for the bungee cord holding the bonnet closed? -- Max Heim; /html/mgs/2003-03/msg00843.html (8,746 bytes)
15. Re: Failed MA inspection (score: 1): Author: Bullwinkle <yd3@nvc.net>; Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 17:14:16 -0600; <<<snip>>> hat email program are you using. I had to reformat every paragraph as it didn't wrap. Took me 3 times longer to do this email because of it. <<<Snip>>> Check your own email settings. I am; /html/mgs/2003-03/msg00845.html (7,887 bytes)
16. Re: Failed MA inspection (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@attbi.com>; Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 16:17:39 -0800; Whoa! Wrong guy -- I didn't make any comments about email... Make sure you're replying to the person who made the comment in question. I followed the thread back three posts to see that it was Paul R; /html/mgs/2003-03/msg00846.html (8,385 bytes)
17. Re: Failed MA inspection (score: 1): Author: Tab Julius <tab@penworks.com>; Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 19:47:34 -0500; Really? No safety inspections in California? /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool /// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive; /html/mgs/2003-03/msg00847.html (7,651 bytes)
18. Re: Failed MA inspection (score: 1): Author: Charles & Peggy Robinson <ccrobins@ktc.com>; Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 19:13:51 -0600; If the king pins are that loose they need replacing, all right. That's a danger to you and anyone you might run in to if they cause a shimmy and loss of control. As to the oil leak, it would appear; /html/mgs/2003-03/msg00849.html (8,963 bytes)
19. Re: Failed MA inspection (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@attbi.com>; Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 17:26:30 -0800; That's right. Land of the Free, or The Wild Wild West <g>... Think about it -- 60 million cars (or something like that) -- it would require a huge new state bureaucracy. Not that that would stop anyb; /html/mgs/2003-03/msg00850.html (8,685 bytes)
20. Re: Failed MA inspection (score: 1): Author: Tab Julius <tab@penworks.com>; Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 22:06:10 -0500; I could see it in Texas "Last bastion of self-rule", but California, Progressive State, I would have figured had an aggressive safety program. Surprised to hear it has none at all. Of course, could t; /html/mgs/2003-03/msg00852.html (9,055 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]