Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Fram\s+Filter\s+for\s+Moss\s+MGA\s+Oil\s+Filter\s+Conversion\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Fram\s+Filter\s+for\s+Moss\s+MGA\s+Oil\s+Filter\s+Conversion\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. Fram Filter for Moss MGA Oil Filter Conversion (score: 1): Author: RatiganJ@aol.com; Date: Sat, 12 Apr 1997 09:51:13 -0400 (EDT); Does anyone know the Fram number for the spin on filter adapter that Moss sells for the MGA 1500? Thanks...Joe Ratigan - 58 1500 Roadster; /html/mgs/1997-04/msg00528.html (7,689 bytes)
2. Re: Fram Filter for Moss MGA Oil Filter Conversion (score: 1): Author: barneymg@juno.com (Barney Gaylord); Date: Sat, 12 Apr 1997 12:21:26 EDT; Moss sells for the MGA 1500? Thanks...Joe Ratigan - 58 1500 Roadster Yep. Cross references to all of the following, and maybe more. Fram PH43 NAPA 1068 AC Delco PF-20 Motorcraft FL-300 Purolator L200; /html/mgs/1997-04/msg00538.html (8,165 bytes)
3. Re: Fram Filter for Moss MGA Oil Filter Conversion (score: 1): Author: dmeadow@juno.com (David C Littlefield); Date: Sat, 12 Apr 1997 12:50:05 EDT; I had a lot of trouble with this when I did my conversion. The filter that comes with the kit is some strange (British?) brand that I never heard of and is not cross-referenced in any of the books. F; /html/mgs/1997-04/msg00541.html (8,652 bytes)
4. Re: Fram Filter for Moss MGA Oil Filter Conversion (score: 1): Author: Trmgafun@aol.com; Date: Sat, 12 Apr 1997 13:33:34 -0400 (EDT); << Does anyone know the Fram number for the spin on filter adapter that Moss sells for the MGA 1500? Thanks...Joe Ratigan - 58 1500 Roadster Joe, I use both Fram PH3600 or AC PF56. Scott in Northern; /html/mgs/1997-04/msg00545.html (8,486 bytes)
5. Re: Fram Filter for Moss MGA Oil Filter Conversion (score: 1): Author: dfdarby@juno.com; Date: Sat, 12 Apr 1997 14:20:38 PST; Hello Joe: me, seems identical in every way. I am now running WIX 51034. It is 10mm shorter than the Fram and is much easier to change out in the cramped space on both the MGA and the MGB. Regards, D; /html/mgs/1997-04/msg00596.html (8,776 bytes)
6. Re: Fram Filter for Moss MGA Oil Filter Conversion (score: 1): Author: Ron Parkinson <ronp@hasbro.com>; Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 00:18:54 -0400; If I don't see a post I'll check the barn tomorrow, I think they are all the same on the Moss kits. I have one on a vintage race engine for a TD. Ron; /html/mgs/1997-04/msg00600.html (8,592 bytes)
7. Re: Fram Filter for Moss MGA Oil Filter Conversion (score: 1): Author: Dave Houser <mgs4dave@warwick.net>; Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 11:15:11 +0000; Regarding all the different types and numbers of replacement spin-offs for Moss' conversion, I wonder shouldn't there be an internal pressure relief valve inherent in the selection of filters used? M; /html/mgs/1997-04/msg00618.html (8,743 bytes)
8. Re: Fram Filter for Moss MGA Oil Filter Conversion (score: 1): Author: Chip Old <fold@mail.bcpl.lib.md.us>; Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 11:57:09 -0400 (EDT); That is true. The fact that several filters from the same manufacturer have the same exterior size, thread size, and gasket diameter doesn't mean they are all suitable for the same application. Some; /html/mgs/1997-04/msg00621.html (9,822 bytes)
9. Re: Fram Filter for Moss MGA Oil Filter Conversion (score: 1): Author: Bud Krueger <bkrueger@ici.net>; Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 19:49:18 -0400; FYI, the NAPA filter number is 1034 (drop the first Wix digit). Bud Krueger; /html/mgs/1997-04/msg00635.html (9,686 bytes)
10. Re: Fram Filter for Moss MGA Oil Filter Conversion (score: 1): Author: dmeadow@juno.com; Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 20:11:57 EDT; So we come full circle on the original question as to which is the proper replacement filter for the spin-off conversion kit for the MGA. Using only Fram numbers for simplicity, we have the following; /html/mgs/1997-04/msg00643.html (11,692 bytes)
11. Re: Fram Filter for Moss MGA Oil Filter Conversion (score: 1): Author: Chip Old <fold@mail.bcpl.lib.md.us>; Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 21:51:57 -0400 (EDT); If the filter hangs vertically below the adapter, then there is probably no need for an anti-drainback valve. Note the "probably". Filter position isn't the only deciding factor here. On some engines; /html/mgs/1997-04/msg00645.html (14,162 bytes)
12. Re: Fram Filter for Moss MGA Oil Filter Conversion (score: 1): Author: DANMAS@aol.com; Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 23:56:08 -0400 (EDT); << An internal pressure relief valve is required? Why? Surely the cotton filter / canister stock setup has no pressure relief valve. If it is required, how does one know the proper pressure, then how; /html/mgs/1997-04/msg00653.html (9,674 bytes)
13. Re: Fram Filter for Moss MGA Oil Filter Conversion (score: 1): Author: barneymg@juno.com (Barney Gaylord); Date: Tue, 15 Apr 1997 07:12:20 EDT; proper replacement filter for the spin-off conversion kit for the MGA. Using only Fram numbers for simplicity, we have the following candidates: < ..... How do we know which is right? The PH 43 says; /html/mgs/1997-04/msg00657.html (18,855 bytes)
14. Re: Fram Filter for Moss MGA Oil Filter Conversion (score: 1): Author: Ron Parkinson <ronp@hasbro.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Apr 1997 07:43:41 -0400 (EDT); Yes and Thank You! Ron; /html/mgs/1997-04/msg00659.html (8,965 bytes)
15. Re: Fram Filter for Moss MGA Oil Filter Conversion (score: 1): Author: bugide@juno.com (Larry Dickstein); Date: Tue, 15 Apr 1997 09:39:26 EDT; Yep, I did and it all makes perfect sense. Thanks. Larry Dickstein bugide@juno.com; /html/mgs/1997-04/msg00664.html (8,689 bytes)
16. Re: Fram Filter for Moss MGA Oil Filter Conversion (score: 1): Author: dmeadow@juno.com; Date: Tue, 15 Apr 1997 12:44:29 EDT; Thank you for a coherent, cohesive, thorough discussion of the subject. I think the net of it is that the filter I'm using is probably OK. I do have the following questions, however. On Tue, 15 Apr; /html/mgs/1997-04/msg00672.html (10,743 bytes)
17. Re: Fram Filter for Moss MGA Oil Filter Conversion (score: 1): Author: dmeadow@juno.com; Date: Tue, 15 Apr 1997 12:44:29 EDT; Thanks, Chip, for your help. Barney posted a thorough discussion, as well. For years I have been justifying the use of the PH 3614 with the thought "well, whatever it is, it has GOT to be better than; /html/mgs/1997-04/msg00673.html (15,639 bytes)
18. Re: Fram Filter for Moss MGA Oil Filter Conversion (score: 1): Author: barneymg@juno.com (Barney Gaylord); Date: Tue, 15 Apr 1997 14:43:57 EDT; internally to the engine block, and would bypass oil without being filtered. Moss discovered the problem and stopped selling it shortly thereafter. have to check my records tonight). How do I know if; /html/mgs/1997-04/msg00678.html (12,164 bytes)
19. Re: Fram Filter for Moss MGA Oil Filter Conversion (score: 1): Author: RatiganJ@aol.com; Date: Tue, 15 Apr 1997 16:57:59 -0400 (EDT); My thoughts exactly. Maybe someone would like to take this on as a research project...Joe Ratigan; /html/mgs/1997-04/msg00684.html (8,184 bytes)
20. Re: Fram Filter for Moss MGA Oil Filter Conversion (score: 1): Author: RatiganJ@aol.com; Date: Tue, 15 Apr 1997 17:23:27 -0400 (EDT); Yes, I finished reading your entire post and now retract my earlier comment that someone should take this on as a research topic...I see that you have. Thanks for the help. I believe I can now go an; /html/mgs/1997-04/msg00686.html (8,217 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]