Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Gearbox\s+dowels\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Gearbox\s+dowels\s+\?\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. Gearbox dowels ? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 17:46:36 -0800; Tackling what I thought was a bad throw-out bearing on my Mk I Stag, I've discovered that some previous mechanic left out some of the gearbox to flywheel housing bolts. The result is fairly predictab; /html/triumphs/2004-12/msg00723.html (6,992 bytes)
2. Re: Gearbox dowels ? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 02:50:51 -0000; Hi Randall The Dowell bolts are just 3/8 UNF bolts with a plain shank long enough to go through the back plate of the engine and most of the way through the bell housing (flywheel housing), the head; /html/triumphs/2004-12/msg00760.html (8,194 bytes)
3. RE: Gearbox dowels ? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 20:50:00 -0800; If they're ordinary bolts, why do they have 6 digit part numbers rather than standard hardware numbers ? There are even two other ordinary 3/8 UNF bolts used, which do have the "standard hardware" n; /html/triumphs/2004-12/msg00761.html (7,833 bytes)
4. Gearbox dowels ? (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <ryoung@navcomtech.com>; Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 17:46:36 -0800; Tackling what I thought was a bad throw-out bearing on my Mk I Stag, I've discovered that some previous mechanic left out some of the gearbox to flywheel housing bolts. The result is fairly predictab; /html/triumphs/2004-12/msg01485.html (7,510 bytes)
5. Re: Gearbox dowels ? (score: 1): Author: "Graham Stretch" <technical-iwnet@wight365.net>; Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 02:50:51 -0000; Hi Randall The Dowell bolts are just 3/8 UNF bolts with a plain shank long enough to go through the back plate of the engine and most of the way through the bell housing (flywheel housing), the head; /html/triumphs/2004-12/msg01522.html (8,787 bytes)
6. RE: Gearbox dowels ? (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 20:50:00 -0800; If they're ordinary bolts, why do they have 6 digit part numbers rather than standard hardware numbers ? There are even two other ordinary 3/8 UNF bolts used, which do have the "standard hardware" n; /html/triumphs/2004-12/msg01523.html (8,369 bytes)
7. Re: Gearbox dowels ? (score: 1): Author: Jim Barbuscia <jimbar@centurytel.net>; Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2005 21:38:55 -0800; What about roll pins? -jimb; /html/triumphs/2005-01/msg00027.html (9,102 bytes)
8. Re: Gearbox dowels ? (score: 1): Author: "Graham Stretch" <technical-iwnet@wight365.net>; Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 14:27:56 -0000; Hi Randall I do appreciate the necessity for the bolts to be a good fit for the location of the gearbox input shaft and have been known to both, preach the necessity to always use the dowel bolts, an; /html/triumphs/2005-01/msg00047.html (8,479 bytes)
9. RE: Gearbox dowels ? (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 20:09:52 -0800; Hi Graham : I guess that would include the "professional" mechanic that I had to the job on my Stag a couple years ago. I intend to tell the shop owner about it next time I see him, as he's a "friend; /html/triumphs/2005-01/msg00050.html (9,403 bytes)
10. Re: Gearbox dowels ? (score: 1): Author: "Kai M. Radicke" <kradicke@wishboneclassics.com>; Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 07:26:04 -0500; Randall, have you considered that the dowel bolts were never there in the first place? While I did read that you had multiple bell housing bolts missing, I have good reason to believe that the dowel; /html/triumphs/2005-01/msg00061.html (9,807 bytes)
11. Re: Gearbox dowels ? (score: 1): Author: "Graham Stretch" <technical-iwnet@wight365.net>; Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 17:04:58 -0000; Hi Kai I have had many cars from 1965 2000 Saloon to 1977 2500S saloon (have worked on a 1978 registered 2500S which must have been one of the last) and all had dowel bolts installed, I would guess t; /html/triumphs/2005-01/msg00065.html (10,450 bytes)
12. Re: Gearbox dowels ? (score: 1): Author: Jeff Johnson <mondoluxe@ameritech.net>; Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 12:35:58 -0500; That is an interesting theory Kai, however, my late production ''76 TR6 had the dowels when I did it's first clutch job in 1981 when the fork pin broke. Jeff Johnson; /html/triumphs/2005-01/msg00066.html (7,527 bytes)
13. RE: Gearbox dowels ? (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 09:53:12 -0800; It's certainly possible that some were deliberately built without the dowel bolts, but I doubt that applies to my Stag. It's a very early car, the SPC I have was clearly updated multiple times after; /html/triumphs/2005-01/msg00068.html (9,406 bytes)
14. RE: Gearbox dowels ? (score: 1): Author: John & Patricia Donnelly <pdonnel1@san.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 12:30:15 -0800; Hmmm. Since you used the past tense, does that mean the dowels are now gone? John; /html/triumphs/2005-01/msg00072.html (7,903 bytes)
15. RE: Gearbox dowels ? (score: 1): Author: Jeff Johnson <mondoluxe@ameritech.net>; Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 16:54:47 -0500; When I wrote that post, it originally said," had and still has the locating dowels", however, when I proof-read it I thought the language to be somewhat stilted, so I deleted the present tense. And y; /html/triumphs/2005-01/msg00075.html (9,059 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]