Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Have\s+I\s+lost\s+my\s+mind\/\s+Triumph\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Have\s+I\s+lost\s+my\s+mind\/\s+Triumph\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Have I lost my mind/ Triumph (score: 1): Author: Carl French <leylandauto@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 17:41:30 -0700 (PDT); I may have had a car follow me home today. A fellow moving out of state contacted my mechanic today in ref to loosing his storage space due to the move and needing to get rid of his Stag project as h; /html/mgs/2003-09/msg00039.html (8,213 bytes)
2. Re: Have I lost my mind/ Triumph (score: 1): Author: "Kai M. Radicke" <kai@radiohead.net>; Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 22:33:58 -0400; The Stag is a wonderful car... when in proper shape. Things that suck about the Stag: Waterpump leaks, head gasket failures, finding parts, electrical gremlins related to power windows and other pow; /html/mgs/2003-09/msg00040.html (10,107 bytes)
3. Re: Have I lost my mind/ Triumph (score: 1): Author: Dan DiBiase <d_dibiase@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 04:46:17 -0700 (PDT); Gee, Carl, kinda hard to argue with the price, eh?! I always thought the Stag was a great-looking car and it's on my list of coveted cars. Not knowing anything about the restoration costs involved or; /html/mgs/2003-09/msg00045.html (7,856 bytes)
4. Re: Have I lost my mind/ Triumph (score: 1): Author: WSpohn4@aol.com; Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 15:22:19 EDT; The Stag wasn't significantly faster than the stock MGC, although you will see figures varying by a second or so in the 0-60 (usually 9.5 to 10.5 range for both). Neither was quite as fast as an MGA; /html/mgs/2003-09/msg00054.html (7,788 bytes)
5. Re: Have I lost my mind/ Triumph (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>; Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2003 18:51:13 -0700; One reason these figures were so inconsistent in the old road tests is because there was no standardized procedure.Road & Track, for instance, tested all the 60s sports cars with a driver and a passe; /html/mgs/2003-09/msg00056.html (8,710 bytes)
6. Re: Have I lost my mind/ Triumph (score: 1): Author: "Telewest $PH$" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>; Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2003 14:53:43 +0100; 180 lbs? Did you know Abingdon only allowed for 150 lbs per person? I doubt any Brit was even 150 lbs when these cars were initially tested, let alone 180 lbs ... ;o) Never mind dumping the clutch, t; /html/mgs/2003-09/msg00081.html (8,273 bytes)
7. Re: Have I lost my mind/ Triumph (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>; Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2003 11:47:39 -0700; They were probably thinking of 150 pounds as the "average of two persons", one being female. As for average size of Brits, I dunno... look at Winston Churchill. Anyway, my 180 lb. number was based on; /html/mgs/2003-09/msg00085.html (9,089 bytes)
8. Re: Have I lost my mind/ Triumph (score: 1): Author: "Telewest $PH$" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>; Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 13:16:40 +0100; Winston Churchill was never average in anything ... :o) As for the clutch I remembered seeing some in-car footage of Hannu Mikola (I think) driving a rally car in the 70s. They used conventional cont; /html/mgs/2003-09/msg00113.html (8,156 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]