Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Hearld\s+vs\.\s+Spitfire\s+front\s+springs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Hearld\s+vs\.\s+Spitfire\s+front\s+springs\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Hearld vs. Spitfire front springs (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 19 Dec 1997 06:46:55 -0800; Andy (or anybody), Do you know the spring rates of the Hearld vs. the Spitfire. What I need is a slightly, around 50 lbs, heavier spring rate than the latest Spitfire spring with the same installed h; /html/triumphs/1997-12/msg00980.html (7,288 bytes)
2. Re: Hearld vs. Spitfire front springs (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 19 Dec 1997 16:03:15 -0500charset="iso-8859-1"; Have you seen the SPAX spring adjus table shocks for the Spitfire they work great. You can actually ajust the ride height as well as the reaction of the shocks. Moss as well as a couple other vender; /html/triumphs/1997-12/msg01006.html (8,219 bytes)
3. Re: Hearld vs. Spitfire front springs (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 19 Dec 1997 13:45:44 -0800; ** Tommy, Thanks for the input. Yes I have thought about using those but haven't for two reasons. One, I really can't justify spending that kind of money to replace a perfectly good pair of Koni's a; /html/triumphs/1997-12/msg01008.html (7,493 bytes)
4. Re: Hearld vs. Spitfire front springs (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 19 Dec 1997 13:57:44 -0800; Barry, If you can't find a more suitable solution, you can always resort to shortening the GT6 springs enough to achieve the correct height. They may ride a little stiffer than you want, but it shoul; /html/triumphs/1997-12/msg01009.html (8,312 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]