Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Loctite\?\s+\(was\:\s+Lock\s+tabs\s+vs\s+lock\s+washers\)\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Loctite? (was: Lock tabs vs lock washers) (score: 1)
Author: Ulix Goettsch <ulix@u.washington.edu>
Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 15:24:46 -0700 (PDT)
Do people really use Loctiteon rod and main bolts? I can still change that, my engine is only half assembled. Ulix Ulix __/__,__ ___/__|__ ..............................................(_o____o_)....
/html/spridgets/1999-05/msg01125.html (8,607 bytes)

2. Re: Loctite? (was: Lock tabs vs lock washers) (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>
Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 18:45:08 -0700
Dave are you torquing everything while it is still wet to ensure that it doesn't effect the torque values? Keith Turk Austin Healey 100 / Bugeye / Box Sprite / Bonneville Land Speed Racer Camaro ( D
/html/spridgets/1999-05/msg01128.html (8,706 bytes)

3. Re: Loctite? (was: Lock tabs vs lock washers) (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Atwater" <tob@taltec.net>
Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 17:11:28 -0700
not looking to stir up trouble, but... did locktight exist at the factory? what did they use? new lock tabs I presume...maybe this is just for purists... but it seems to me, that they knew what they
/html/spridgets/1999-05/msg01129.html (8,123 bytes)

4. Re: Loctite? (was: Lock tabs vs lock washers) (score: 1)
Author: HFC <froggi@cdsnet.net>
Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 17:54:21 -0700
It's just a bit more insurance against the potential of one coming loose. I've not had one come off when used, but then I've not lost one when I failed to use it either. Let's see what others say. W
/html/spridgets/1999-05/msg01133.html (9,142 bytes)

5. Re: Loctite? (was: Lock tabs vs lock washers) (score: 1)
Author: Scott Fisher <sefisher@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 18:11:41 -0700
They knew what they were doing -- for the time. But there have been some improvements in materials science and automotive engineering since 1956. I mean, they didn't use alternators on Bugeyes either
/html/spridgets/1999-05/msg01134.html (11,818 bytes)

6. Re: Loctite? (was: Lock tabs vs lock washers) (score: 1)
Author: RHDSprite@cs.com
Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 21:19:08 EDT
I saw this one and had to add my $.02 worth. I stopped using lock tabs and use only locktite and have never had a problem. I have rebuilt all the different engines 948s, 1098s, and the 1275. Addition
/html/spridgets/1999-05/msg01135.html (8,171 bytes)

7. Re: Loctite? (was: Lock tabs vs lock washers) (score: 1)
Author: Ronsoave@aol.com
Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 21:31:55 EDT
I was taught use it, but very carefully for possibility getting a false torque reading. My mentor was real big on gradual torquing (5 or 10 lb increments), so you better not let it set at all! I was
/html/spridgets/1999-05/msg01137.html (8,635 bytes)

8. Re: Loctite? (was: Lock tabs vs lock washers) (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>
Date: Thu, 20 May 1999 00:20:15 -0700
Just make sure all that Silicone doesn't end up in the Oil passages... but I agree you would never even consider putting the heads on the 302 without copious amounts of sealer.... it would spring a l
/html/spridgets/1999-05/msg01147.html (9,513 bytes)

9. Re: Loctite? (was: Lock tabs vs lock washers) (score: 1)
Author: Daniel1312@aol.com
Date: Thu, 20 May 1999 14:56:40 EDT
<< not looking to stir up trouble, but... did locktight exist at the factory? what did they use? new lock tabs I presume...maybe this is just for purists... but it seems to me, that they knew what th
/html/spridgets/1999-05/msg01179.html (7,959 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu