Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Lucas\s+Sports\s+Coil\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Lucas\s+Sports\s+Coil\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Lucas Sports Coil (score: 1): Author: "DonH" <donham1@cox.net>; Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 16:54:37 -0500; Are their any performance plus's by using a Lucas Sports Coil compared to a old original Lucas coil? Thanks, Don, 63BJ7; /html/healeys/2006-08/msg00239.html (6,601 bytes)
2. Re: Lucas Sports Coil (score: 1): Author: "Alan Seigrist Blue 100" <healey.nut@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 21:57:16 -0700; If you are running standard points it doesn't make much of a difference. If you have pertronix, you will get sufficient dwell where you will have a much stronger spark. At the end of the day, I don'; /html/healeys/2006-08/msg00246.html (7,171 bytes)
3. Re: Lucas Sports Coil (score: 1): Author: "Greg Lemon" <glemon@neb.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 03:02:40 -0500; I would agree with Alan, from what I have read the only time it may help is in extremely high rpm/compression situations, given that my redline is under 5000 I doubt if it makes much difference on my; /html/healeys/2006-08/msg00249.html (6,963 bytes)
4. Re: Lucas Sports Coil (score: 1): Author: John Harper <AH@jharper.demon.co.uk>; Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 12:14:46 +0100; I also agree; particularly with a four cylinder car where you only need 2/3rds the number of sparks per minute as a six cylinder at the same rpm. At high revs it is the coil recovery time that matter; /html/healeys/2006-08/msg00250.html (7,423 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]