Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*MC\s+Chain\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*MC\s+Chain\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. MC Chain (score: 1): Author: "Dana Goulston" <dana@goulston.net>; Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 19:17:22 -0700; Hi all, Would I save anything by going from a 530 chain to a 520 chain on my bike? A friend says the difference in moving (chain) mass free up horsies. Is there any truth to this ??? Dana /// unsubsc; /html/land-speed/2002-09/msg00010.html (7,546 bytes)
2. Re: MC Chain (score: 1): Author: "gary baker" <lsr350@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 13:59:52 +1000; 520 is used over here by all the racers as it constitutes a weight saving and I'm assured that its tensile strength is equal to 530, I'm sticking to 530 mainly because its cheaper and I can get my c; /html/land-speed/2002-09/msg00013.html (8,302 bytes)
3. Re: MC Chain (score: 1): Author: "Nafzger" <nafzger@vtc.net>; Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 21:35:01 -0700; When Bryan Savage and I ran the motorcycle powered streamliner we ran 520 Tsubaki Premium o-ring chain and had no strength problems with it and for that matter could not wear it out. Our car was tur; /html/land-speed/2002-09/msg00017.html (7,857 bytes)
4. Re: MC Chain (score: 1): Author: pork.pie@t-online.de (Pork Pie); Date: 02 Sep 2002 18:59 GMT; We use exactly the same in our streamliner #286 since we start in 96 - and we never got trouble with the Tsubaki. I can only agree to Howard comments. See ya Pork Pie "Nafzger" <nafzger@vtc.net> sch; /html/land-speed/2002-09/msg00024.html (8,287 bytes)
5. Re: MC Chain (score: 1): Author: ardunbill@webtv.net; Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 08:55:43 -0400 (EDT); Hi Dana, I also use and recommend Tsubaki Omega o-ring chain with a rivet master link. The 520 size for racing bikes has been traditional since about the '20s because the chain and sprockets are ligh; /html/land-speed/2002-09/msg00038.html (8,241 bytes)
6. Re: MC Chain (score: 1): Author: "Rick Yacoucci" <turborick@TurboRick.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 07:49:33 -0700; Looks like I am the ODDball here. I do not and will not ever use a Tsubaki I have broke 2 low mileage chains and they stretch like crazy. I use the RK Oring chains never broke one, they stretch for t; /html/land-speed/2002-09/msg00044.html (9,315 bytes)
7. RE: MC Chain (score: 1): Author: "Russel Mack" <rtmack@concentric.net>; Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 09:52:34 -0500; somebody on the MC Chassis list posted a short table of efficiency comparisons for MC drive systems. As I recall, the worst efficiency was shaft-drive, and the 2nd-best was o-ring chain. The most ef; /html/land-speed/2002-09/msg00045.html (8,970 bytes)
8. Re: MC Chain (score: 1): Author: "Bryan A. Savage Jr" <basavage@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2002 08:43:24 -0700; Rick, some additional detail to Howard's comment. After Howard ran the car in 1987 with a stock motor and Duckworth racing chain, I was in a panic. In seven runs the chain wore/stretched so much that; /html/land-speed/2002-09/msg00048.html (9,029 bytes)
9. Re: MC Chain (score: 1): Author: "Rick Yacoucci" <turborick@TurboRick.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 09:09:18 -0700; Russ I made my own non oring chain I took a pick and removed all the orings from an oring chain it made more RWHP on the dyno ( I think 4hp ) but all the lube went away very quickly. Rick runs -- Out; /html/land-speed/2002-09/msg00049.html (10,235 bytes)
10. Re: MC Chain (score: 1): Author: "Rick Yacoucci" <turborick@TurboRick.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 09:26:30 -0700; The top fuel bikes use a 630 non oring Drag racing chain that is so big it won't fit on any of my bikes and sprockets have to be custom made and cost........we won't even go there. But like you said; /html/land-speed/2002-09/msg00050.html (10,515 bytes)
11. RE: MC Chain (score: 1): Author: "Clay, Dale" <Dale.Clay@mdhelicopters.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 10:05:47 -0700; Good enough for most of the MotoGP and World Superbike teams too. You didn't say whether 520 or 530. Dale C. I use the RK Oring chains never broke one, they stretch for the first 2 runs but after tha; /html/land-speed/2002-09/msg00052.html (9,240 bytes)
12. Re: MC Chain (score: 1): Author: "Rick Yacoucci" <turborick@TurboRick.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 10:25:52 -0700; I use a 530 it has 10000 lbs tensile the 520 only has 8800 lbs tensile Rick -- please -- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0; /html/land-speed/2002-09/msg00053.html (10,079 bytes)
13. RE: MC Chain (score: 1): Author: "Clay, Dale" <Dale.Clay@mdhelicopters.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 11:19:03 -0700; Thanks, Rick. I don't think tensile strength will be my major concern. If I can get 125 HP I'll be very happy. I use a 530 it has 10000 lbs tensile the 520 only has 8800 lbs tensile Rick -- The infor; /html/land-speed/2002-09/msg00054.html (9,243 bytes)
14. RE: MC Chain (score: 1): Author: "Russel Mack" <rtmack@concentric.net>; Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 14:34:03 -0500; to complete that west-coast look, you need a Blue Hat! Russ --Original Message-- From: owner-land-speed@autox.team.net [mailto:owner-land-speed@autox.team.net]On Behalf Of Rick Yacoucci Sent: Tuesda; /html/land-speed/2002-09/msg00058.html (10,749 bytes)
15. RE: MC Chain (score: 1): Author: ardunbill@webtv.net; Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 18:20:27 -0400 (EDT); Dale, I suspect the rear fork might start to give way before you got to 8800 lbs of chain pull! It would take an almighty violent abusive clutch start to get that much snatch on it. Seriously, the pu; /html/land-speed/2002-09/msg00063.html (8,754 bytes)
16. RE: MC Chain (score: 1): Author: "Clay, Dale" <Dale.Clay@mdhelicopters.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 15:45:43 -0700; You're right, Bill. But even if I had that kind of power, we don't have that kind of traction. Dale Dale, I suspect the rear fork might start to give way before you got to 8800 lbs of chain pull! It; /html/land-speed/2002-09/msg00066.html (9,585 bytes)
17. Re: MC Chain (score: 1): Author: Joe Amo <jkamo@rap.midco.net>; Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2002 16:57:35 -0600; You could go through the math that will never completely take into account all forces and vectors or you could see broken and stretched too far chains with brand x, and unbroken and nearly maintenanc; /html/land-speed/2002-09/msg00067.html (9,178 bytes)
18. FW: MC Chain (score: 1): Author: "Dana Goulston" <dana@goulston.net>; Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 16:55:41 -0700; Yes, I run the RK X-ring 530 (130-link) chain. Lots of stretch at first than very little. I go to the local drag strip for a dozen or so runs the week before each lakes meet to dial in the carbs (lot; /html/land-speed/2002-09/msg00080.html (9,824 bytes)
19. Re: MC Chain (score: 1): Author: "DrMayf" <drmayf@teknett.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 17:44:18 -0700; Well, all...don't know much about bikes cept I once rode a Vincent. But, this is an interesting thread. If the breaking strength of the chain is 8800 lbs and the rear chain wheel is say 8 inches in d; /html/land-speed/2002-09/msg00082.html (10,051 bytes)
20. Re: MC Chain (score: 1): Author: "Rick Yacoucci" <turborick@TurboRick.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 17:54:20 -0700; Would be nice!! -- Original Message -- From: "Russel Mack" <rtmack@concentric.net> To: "Rick Yacoucci" <turborick@TurboRick.com>; "Bryan A. Savage Jr" <basavage@earthlink.net> Cc: ">land-speedautox.t; /html/land-speed/2002-09/msg00083.html (11,362 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]