Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*MG\-TD\s+Rear\s+Axle\s+Gear\s+Ratio\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*MG\-TD\s+Rear\s+Axle\s+Gear\s+Ratio\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. MG-TD Rear Axle Gear Ratio (score: 1): Author: rdonahue@holli.com (Robert J. Donahue); Date: Sun, 24 Sep 95 19:58 EST; I am very much confused about the highway capability of the old TD. I am currently restoring one and would like to take it on short 50 mi trips where the speed limit reaches 65 mph. I hear that the h; /html/mgs/1995-09/msg00586.html (8,247 bytes)
2. RE: MG-TD Rear Axle Gear Ratio (score: 1): Author: "Palmer, Lew (UCI)" <LEW@p01.uci.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Sep 95 08:54:00 PDT; I hate to break it to you, but the standard ratio TD diff. is 5.125:1. Even worse than you suspected. Nonetheless, I've been running happily of this ratio for almost 15 years with no real adverse ef; /html/mgs/1995-09/msg00594.html (10,922 bytes)
3. RE: MG-TD Rear Axle Gear Ratio (score: 1): Author: "Unger, Larry @ RES" <UNGERL@Reston.UnisysGSG.COM>; Date: Mon, 25 Sep 95 11:40:00 EDT; ->I hate to break it to you, but the standard ratio TD diff. is 5.125:1. Even ->worse than you suspected. -> Ouch ... ->You can put in a lower ratio gear set. The MGA used a 43/10 ratio and is a ->p; /html/mgs/1995-09/msg00599.html (8,618 bytes)
4. RE: MG-TD Rear Axle Gear Ratio (score: 1): Author: "A. B. Bonds" <ab@vuse.vanderbilt.edu>; Date: 25 Sep 1995 10:43:44 -0500; Even with the 54 hp engine, one can squeak the tyres in third gear. But the downside is, as commented upon, the feeling that the clutch will disintegrate and take out one's kneecaps when at freeway (; /html/mgs/1995-09/msg00600.html (8,975 bytes)
5. RE: MG-TD Rear Axle Gear Ratio (score: 1): Author: "A. B. Bonds" <ab@vuse.vanderbilt.edu>; Date: 25 Sep 1995 11:10:55 -0500; Oh, nonnononono. The TD rear end is yet another version of how not to build a rear end. It has neither a back plate (like the tube-type B axles) nor a punkin' (chunk) like the banjo-type A and B axle; /html/mgs/1995-09/msg00602.html (9,312 bytes)
6. RE: MG-TD Rear Axle Gear Ratio (score: 1): Author: "Unger, Larry @ RES" <UNGERL@Reston.UnisysGSG.COM>; Date: Mon, 25 Sep 95 14:01:00 EDT; ->>Is the 'pumpkin' on the TD the same as on the A? If so you could substitute ->>a used A/B pumpkin (Moss Catalog Part #s for the A/B banjo rear parts are ->>thesame) ... you may have to change the; /html/mgs/1995-09/msg00606.html (8,462 bytes)
7. RE: MG-TD Rear Axle Gear Ratio (score: 1): Author: "Palmer, Lew (UCI)" <LEW@p01.uci.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Sep 95 13:06:00 PDT; No, the whole MGA pumpkin will not fit. Besides, the whole interface between the axles and the pumpkin is differently sized. However, the ring will fit, as is. The pinion sits in a different position; /html/mgs/1995-09/msg00607.html (9,426 bytes)
8. RE: MG-TD Rear Axle Gear Ratio (score: 1): Author: "Palmer, Lew (UCI)" <LEW@p01.uci.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Sep 95 13:17:00 PDT; I've got a lower-rear-end-ratio kit in my workshop but have not installed it because I still don't have the patience for that kind of fiddling. Sound familiar? A. B. Bonds == The really interesting t; /html/mgs/1995-09/msg00613.html (8,346 bytes)
9. RE: MG-TD Rear Axle Gear Ratio (score: 1): Author: "Palmer, Lew (UCI)" <LEW@p01.uci.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Sep 95 13:10:00 PDT; In my case: "Yes, I believe the speedo." I've had it calibrated. (I have an excellent and cheap source for having that done, too, if anyone is interested). I have also compared speedos with other car; /html/mgs/1995-09/msg00624.html (9,407 bytes)
10. RE: MG-TD Rear Axle Gear Ratio (score: 1): Author: Tom Britt <rasputin@gate.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Sep 1995 18:38:43 -0400; Even=20 years=20 but it=20 trees=20 Even with the 54 hp engine, one can squeak the tyres in third gear. But the downside is, as commented upon, the feeling that the clutch will disintegrate and take; /html/mgs/1995-09/msg00641.html (10,319 bytes)
11. RE: MG-TD Rear Axle Gear Ratio (score: 1): Author: "Palmer, Lew (UCI)" <LEW@p01.uci.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Sep 95 08:38:00 PDT; OK. Here it is. The pinion spacer my source insists is correct for many of the TD ring and pinion conversions to MGA ring and pinion has a thickness of .083". Of course, I do not recommend that you g; /html/mgs/1995-09/msg00684.html (9,385 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]