Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*MGBGT\s+on\s+eBay\s+Vs\.\s+MGCGT\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*MGBGT\s+on\s+eBay\s+Vs\.\s+MGCGT\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: MGBGT on eBay Vs. MGCGT (score: 1): Author: Rjdisi@aol.com; Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 10:43:12 EST; I would like to expand this question in order to get opinions about the How do they compare? Has anyone owned both? Which do/did you prefer? What, in your opinion(s), is good, bad and the ugly on thi; /html/mgs/2005-12/msg00109.html (6,936 bytes)
2. Re: MGBGT on eBay Vs. MGCGT (score: 1): Author: ATWEDITOR@aol.com; Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 10:48:32 EST; I would like to expand this question in order to get opinions about the MGCGT. How do they compare? Has anyone owned both? Which do/did you prefer? What, in your opinion(s), is good, bad and the ugly; /html/mgs/2005-12/msg00110.html (7,498 bytes)
3. Re: MGBGT on eBay Vs. MGCGT (score: 1): Author: Barrie Robinson <barrie@look.ca>; Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:24:35 -0800; There is a chap here in Canada that has a few (10 - think) MGCs. Personally I have always been wary of the heavy lump in the front. I cannot see how one could avoid the problems associated with this; /html/mgs/2005-12/msg00112.html (8,370 bytes)
4. RE: MGBGT on eBay Vs. MGCGT (score: 1): Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>; Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 10:16:04 -0800; In it's day the MGC was badly trounced by the motoring press because it wasn't an MGB with more power. Even in completely original condition the car was not an evil monster, but did not compare well; /html/mgs/2005-12/msg00115.html (10,016 bytes)
5. Re: MGBGT on eBay Vs. MGCGT (score: 1): Author: "James Schulte" <schultejim@msn.com>; Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:21:01 -0500; I'm in the process of eliminating the C front handling problems. I have a MGC roadster and have ordered the 7/8" front sway bar and the 3/4" back sway bar. A friend has this on his roadster and it ha; /html/mgs/2005-12/msg00118.html (7,893 bytes)
6. Re: MGBGT on eBay Vs. MGCGT (score: 1): Author: "James Schulte" <schultejim@msn.com>; Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:29:25 -0500; I thought the same and so did a friend of mine that has a MGB V8. He now owns a C roadster. He likes driving the C on long trips like I do. No question his V8 is fast but if the C is set up right it; /html/mgs/2005-12/msg00119.html (8,029 bytes)
7. Re: MGBGT on eBay Vs. MGCGT (score: 1): Author: Emjaxfl@aol.com; Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 18:12:57 EST; Greetings All, Just my two cents worth. A 71 BGT would be a desireable choice, as last was the last year before the compression ratio was reduced. Regarding the C, we had two in the family back in th; /html/mgs/2005-12/msg00120.html (8,195 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]