Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Moss\s+or\s+Victoria\s+British\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Moss\s+or\s+Victoria\s+British\?\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. Moss or Victoria British? (score: 1): Author: Robert Marcho <marcho@bible.acu.edu>; Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 10:37:47 -0600; I know this is a fairly subjective question, but I would like to hear the list's advice. I am ready to place a substantial order for exterior and interior body panels to repair rust damage on my "fre; /html/british-cars/2002-01/msg00014.html (8,010 bytes)
2. RE: Moss or Victoria British? (score: 1): Author: "Larry Hoy" <larryhoy@prodigy.net>; Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 12:44:08 -0700; http://www.lbcarco.com/ Jeff Zorn owns the LBC Car Co. I think he is Moss' largest dealer and he offers a discount over Moss' regular price. I have no affiliation with LBC car co. Larry Hoy; /html/british-cars/2002-01/msg00016.html (9,150 bytes)
3. RE: Moss or Victoria British? (score: 1): Author: "Phil Ethier"<pethier@isd.net>; Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 20:12:26 GMT; You might also try http://www.the-roadster-factory.com/ Although they stared out as Triumph place, they entered the MGB market some years ago. Rumor has it that they did so to qualify to sell new bod; /html/british-cars/2002-01/msg00017.html (8,862 bytes)
4. Re: Moss or Victoria British? (score: 1): Author: "John T. Seim" <kingseim@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 12:22:55 -0800; The British Heritage Centre was reproducing the MGB body shells, early and late years. I cannot find an address. Maybe yuo shoudl contactJohn Watson of the M.G. Car Club. <Watson45John@aol.com> John; /html/british-cars/2002-01/msg00018.html (7,951 bytes)
5. RE: Moss or Victoria British? (score: 1): Author: "J.C. Hassall" <jhassall@blacksburg.net>; Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 18:54:46 -0500; I've ordered over $3K worth of parts from TRF over the years, and contacted them this week to return some parts. They want a **50%** return fee, even tho I want to order other parts. Guess what compa; /html/british-cars/2002-01/msg00024.html (8,664 bytes)
6. RE: Moss or Victoria British? (score: 1): Author: "Musson, Carl" <musson@arts.usf.edu>; Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 08:49:30 -0500; In defense - you don't say how old the parts are; were they still in original packaging; you had original shipping receipts; or anything else. You also didn't say if VB would have refunded your full; /html/british-cars/2002-01/msg00025.html (9,683 bytes)
7. RE: Moss or Victoria British? (score: 1): Author: "William E. Snyder" <wsnyder@henderson.lib.nc.us>; Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 09:39:29 -0500; For what it's worth - I started to restore a 65 MGB and ordered about $1000 in parts from the Roadster Factory. About eight months later I found the body shell was too far gone to fool with. So I ask; /html/british-cars/2002-01/msg00026.html (11,018 bytes)
8. Re: Moss or Victoria British? (score: 1): Author: "Fred Thomas" <vafred@erols.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 10:05:01 -0500; I have this morning checked with TRF on Mr. J.C. Hassall's complaint about TRF wanting to charge a 50% return fee == THE LAST ORDER PLACED BY Mr. J.C. Hassle was == SEPT. 29, 1995 == now why he would; /html/british-cars/2002-01/msg00027.html (9,225 bytes)
9. RE: Moss or Victoria British? (score: 1): Author: "Musson, Carl" <musson@arts.usf.edu>; Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 10:45:29 -0500; I do have (and will make it known) concerns that you, Fred, were able to contact TRF and find out ordering patterns of a third party. That is none of your business and should not have been allowed. (; /html/british-cars/2002-01/msg00028.html (9,881 bytes)
10. Re: Moss or Victoria British? (score: 1): Author: Johno8@aol.com; Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 11:24:55 EST; Carl, you are probably correct, but I for one find it quite refreshing that Fred was able to expose Mr. Charles' unethical practice of attempting to defame a business on this list without telling the; /html/british-cars/2002-01/msg00030.html (8,022 bytes)
11. Re: Moss or Victoria British? (score: 1): Author: "Fred Thomas" <vafred@erols.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 11:31:03 -0500; Carl, it is my business as well as yours to protect innocent people/business or any other people associated with this list and our hobby, I only asked for the last purchase date, nothing more, no hab; /html/british-cars/2002-01/msg00031.html (8,319 bytes)
12. RE: Moss or Victoria British? (score: 1): Author: Randall Young <ryoung@NAVCOMTECH.COM>; Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 08:42:36 -0800; Normally I would agree with you, but IMO this is an unusual case. There was a serious public accusation made towards TRF, without all the pertinent facts. Since they do not maintain a presence on th; /html/british-cars/2002-01/msg00032.html (8,886 bytes)
13. RE: Moss or Victoria British? (score: 1): Author: "Phil Ethier"<pethier@isd.net>; Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 18:40:46 GMT; I bought some Spitfire bushings for my Europa. I was pretty ignoran then, that Spitfire bushings don't actually fit on a Europa. TRF refunded my money with no penalty. I considered that more than fai; /html/british-cars/2002-01/msg00033.html (7,956 bytes)
14. RE: Moss or Victoria British? (score: 1): Author: "Musson, Carl" <musson@arts.usf.edu>; Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 16:17:22 -0500; Mr. Charles refers to the owner of TRF not the person who posted the original message. I do agree that exposure was warranted, I just questioned the ability of a third party of finding out the inform; /html/british-cars/2002-01/msg00034.html (8,417 bytes)
15. RE: Moss or Victoria British? (score: 1): Author: "Pete Ryner" <pryner@interfold.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 18:59:13 -0700; I have been a TRF consumer for about 17 years now. I've found that they have consistently the best quality product at very fair prices. In the past few years they have had a problem with keeping the; /html/british-cars/2002-01/msg00037.html (11,058 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]